Abstract
Each Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) is expected to produce an annual report for its establishing authority. Reports from 145 LRECs were examined with regard to (a) whether the committees were working within the terms of the most recent guidelines from the Department of Health and (b) observations on the role of LRECs with particular reference to accountability. Most LRECs had produced a report, although their length varied greatly. Most reports showed how seriously the committee took its task. Most committees met many of the guidelines; for example, almost all had two or more lay-members. The guideline most frequently not met was that committees should have no more than 12 members. Many committees review very large numbers of projects (maximum 351). Approximately two-thirds provide details in the annual report of individual project titles, their author and the committee decision; all reports should contain this information. Although it may in fact happen more generally, only 23 per cent of the reports referred to any form of monitoring of the eventual outcome of the research. A significant issue to arise from the reports is the extent to which the framework for the operation of LRECs has been confused by the development of the purchaser-provider split. The paper concludes with suggestions for remedying the situation.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Gilbert C., Fulford K. W., Parker C. Diversity in the practice of district ethics committees. BMJ. 1989 Dec 9;299(6713):1437–1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6713.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harries U. J., Fentem P. H., Tuxworth W., Hoinville G. W. Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):150–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meade T. W. The trouble with ethics committees. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1994 Mar-Apr;28(2):102–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson I. E., French K., Melia K. M., Boyd K. M., Templeton A. A., Potter B. Research ethical committees in Scotland. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 Feb 28;282(6265):718–720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6265.718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells F. O., Griffin J. P. Ethics committees for clinical research. Experience in the United Kingdom. Drugs. 1989 Mar;37(3):229–232. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937030-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]