Skip to main content
PMC home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1990 Jun;31(6):679–683. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.6.679

Alternative pathways for hydrogen disposal during fermentation in the human colon.

G R Gibson 1, J H Cummings 1, G T Macfarlane 1, C Allison 1, I Segal 1, H H Vorster 1, A R Walker 1
PMCID: PMC1378495  PMID: 2379871

Abstract

Hydrogen gas, which is produced during fermentation in the human colon, is either excreted in breath or metabolised by gut bacteria through a variety of pathways. These may include methanogenesis, dissimilatory sulphate reduction, and acetogenesis. To determine which of these routes predominates in the large intestine, stools were taken from 30 healthy subjects and incubated as 5% (w/v) slurries with Lintner's starch. In 23 of 30 subjects, methane production was the main method of hydrogen disposal. In the remaining seven, high rates of sulphate reduction were recorded together with raised production of H2S. All samples showed relatively low rates of hydrogen evolution and of acetate formation from CO2 and H2. Sulphate reduction and methanogenesis seem to be mutually exclusive in the colon and this is probably linked to sulphate availability. Sulphate reduction, methanogenesis, and acetogenesis were strongly influenced by pH. Sulphate reduction was optimal at alkaline pH values whereas methane production was maximal at a neutral pH and acetogenesis favoured acidic conditions. Faecal H2S values were related to carriage of sulphate reducing bacteria. These data show that a number of competing pathways for hydrogen disposal are possible in the large gut and that a variety of factors such as colonic pH and sulphate availability can determine which of these mechanisms predominates.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison C., Macfarlane G. T. Effect of nitrate on methane production and fermentation by slurries of human faecal bacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Jun;134(6):1397–1405. doi: 10.1099/00221287-134-6-1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balch W. E., Fox G. E., Magrum L. J., Woese C. R., Wolfe R. S. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev. 1979 Jun;43(2):260–296. doi: 10.1128/mr.43.2.260-296.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjørneklett A., Jenssen E. Relationships between hydrogen (H2) and methane (CH4) production in man. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1982 Nov;17(8):985–992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bryant M. P., Campbell L. L., Reddy C. A., Crabill M. R. Growth of desulfovibrio in lactate or ethanol media low in sulfate in association with H2-utilizing methanogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1162–1169. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1162-1169.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cappenberg T. E. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. I. Field observations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(2):285–295. doi: 10.1007/BF00394387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cappenberg T. E. Interrelations between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria in bottom deposits of a fresh-water lake. II. Inhibition experiments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1974;40(2):297–306. doi: 10.1007/BF00394388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cummings J. H., Pomare E. W., Branch W. J., Naylor C. P., Macfarlane G. T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987 Oct;28(10):1221–1227. doi: 10.1136/gut.28.10.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibson G. R., Cummings J. H., Macfarlane G. T. Competition for hydrogen between sulphate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria from the human large intestine. J Appl Bacteriol. 1988 Sep;65(3):241–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibson G. R., Cummings J. H., Macfarlane G. T. Use of a three-stage continuous culture system to study the effect of mucin on dissimilatory sulfate reduction and methanogenesis by mixed populations of human gut bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2750–2755. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2750-2755.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibson G. R., Macfarlane G. T., Cummings J. H. Occurrence of sulphate-reducing bacteria in human faeces and the relationship of dissimilatory sulphate reduction to methanogenesis in the large gut. J Appl Bacteriol. 1988 Aug;65(2):103–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1988.tb01498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones J. G., Simon B. M. Interaction of acetogens and methanogens in anaerobic freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Apr;49(4):944–948. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.4.944-948.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laanbroek H. J., Pfennig N. Oxidation of short-chain fatty acids by sulfate-reducing bacteria in freshwater and in marine sediments. Arch Microbiol. 1981 Jan;128(3):330–335. doi: 10.1007/BF00422540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lajoie S. F., Bank S., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Acetate production from hydrogen and [13C]carbon dioxide by the microflora of human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Nov;54(11):2723–2727. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.11.2723-2727.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levitt M. D., Ingelfinger F. J. Hydrogen and methane production in man. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968 Feb 26;150(1):75–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb19033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Levitt M. D. Production and excretion of hydrogen gas in man. N Engl J Med. 1969 Jul 17;281(3):122–127. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196907172810303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lovley D. R., Dwyer D. F., Klug M. J. Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1373–1379. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.6.1373-1379.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McInerney M. J., Bryant M. P. Anaerobic Degradation of Lactate by Syntrophic Associations of Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio Species and Effect of H(2) on Acetate Degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Feb;41(2):346–354. doi: 10.1128/aem.41.2.346-354.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J., Conway de Macario E., Macario A. J. Isolation of Methanobrevibacter smithii from human feces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jan;43(1):227–232. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.1.227-232.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Methanosphaera stadtmaniae gen. nov., sp. nov.: a species that forms methane by reducing methanol with hydrogen. Arch Microbiol. 1985 Mar;141(2):116–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00423270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Stability of Methanobrevibacter smithii populations in the microbial flora excreted from the human large bowel. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jan;45(1):317–318. doi: 10.1128/aem.45.1.317-318.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oh M. S., Phelps K. R., Traube M., Barbosa-Saldivar J. L., Boxhill C., Carroll H. J. D-lactic acidosis in a man with the short-bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1979 Aug 2;301(5):249–252. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197908023010505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Postgate J. R., Campbell L. L. Classification of Desulfovibrio species, the nonsporulating sulfate-reducing bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1966 Dec;30(4):732–738. doi: 10.1128/br.30.4.732-738.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Segal I., Walker A. R., Lord S., Cummings J. H. Breath methane and large bowel cancer risk in contrasting African populations. Gut. 1988 May;29(5):608–613. doi: 10.1136/gut.29.5.608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sørensen J., Christensen D., Jørgensen B. B. Volatile Fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1981 Jul;42(1):5–11. doi: 10.1128/aem.42.1.5-11.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thauer R. K., Jungermann K., Decker K. Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev. 1977 Mar;41(1):100–180. doi: 10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Whitelaw A., Sleath K. Myth of the marsupial mother: home care of very low birth weight babies in Bogota, Colombia. Lancet. 1985 May 25;1(8439):1206–1208. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92877-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Widdel F., Pfennig N. A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfotomaculum (emend.) acetoxidans. Arch Microbiol. 1977 Feb 4;112(1):119–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00446665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Widdel F., Pfennig N. Sporulation and further nutritional characteristics of Desulfotomaculum acetoxidans. Arch Microbiol. 1981 Jul;129(5):401–402. doi: 10.1007/BF00406471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Widdel F., Pfennig N. Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. I. Isolation of new sulfate-reducing bacteria enriched with acetate from saline environments. Description of Desulfobacter postgatei gen. nov., sp. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1981 Jul;129(5):395–400. doi: 10.1007/BF00406470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES