Table 1.
Poisson regression analysis, campylobacter incidence, Manitoba, 1996 – 2004
Partially Adjusted Model | Fully Adjusted Model | |
Rate Ratio | Rate Ratio | |
aAgegroup: | ||
0–19 | 1.84 (1.48 2.29) | 1.81 (1.48 2.20) |
20–39 | 1.72 (1.39 2.14) | 1.80 (1.47 2.19) |
40–59 | 1.27 (1.01 1.59) | 1.28 (1.04 1.58) |
60–69 | 1.07 (0.80 1.44) | 1.06 (0.81 1.38) |
70+ (reference) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
aGender: | ||
Male | 1.29 (1.16 1.43) | 1.25 (1.14 1.38) |
Female (reference) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
abUrban/Rural: | ||
Rural | 2.06 (1.86 2.27) | 1.46 (1.23 1.73) |
Urban (reference) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
ab Socio-Economic Status Index (SESI) | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 1.03 (0.92 1.16) | 1.14 (1.02 1.27) |
High | 0.86 (0.74 1.00) | 1.49 (1.27 1.74) |
ab Agricultural Occupation | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 2.48 (2.23 2.76) | 1.81 (1.59 2.06) |
High | 2.90 (2.43 3.45) | 2.21 (1.82 2.69) |
ab Composite Animal Density Index (CADI) | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 1.96 (1.76 2.18) | 1.15 (0.98 1.35) |
High | 2.81 (2.42 3.27) | 1.68 (1.39 2.02) |
bc Cow Density | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 1.83 (1.63 2.05) | 1.11 (0.95 1.31) |
High | 2.75 (2.41 3.13) | 1.54 (1.30 1.83) |
bc Pig Density | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 1.86 (1.64 2.11) | 1.12 (0.98 1.28) |
High | 2.73 (2.19 3.40) | 1.99 (1.61 2.46) |
bc Chicken Density | ||
Low – Reference | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Medium | 1.21 (0.87 1.67) | 0.91 (0.68 1.23) |
High | 2.58 (2.08 3.19) | 2.11 (1.73 2.58) |
a Adjusted for all variables except cow, pig and chicken densities in the fully adjusted model
b Adjusted for age group and gender in partially adjusted model
c Adjusted for age group, gender, urban/rural, socio-economic status and agricultural occupation in fully adjusted model
( ) 95% Confidence Intervals, adjusted for model overdispersion