Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 16;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-5-2

Table 1.

Poisson regression analysis, campylobacter incidence, Manitoba, 1996 – 2004

Partially Adjusted Model Fully Adjusted Model
Rate Ratio Rate Ratio
aAgegroup:
 0–19 1.84 (1.48 2.29) 1.81 (1.48 2.20)
 20–39 1.72 (1.39 2.14) 1.80 (1.47 2.19)
 40–59 1.27 (1.01 1.59) 1.28 (1.04 1.58)
 60–69 1.07 (0.80 1.44) 1.06 (0.81 1.38)
 70+ (reference) 1.0 1.0
aGender:
 Male 1.29 (1.16 1.43) 1.25 (1.14 1.38)
 Female (reference) 1.0 1.0
abUrban/Rural:
 Rural 2.06 (1.86 2.27) 1.46 (1.23 1.73)
 Urban (reference) 1.0 1.0
ab Socio-Economic Status Index (SESI)
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 1.03 (0.92 1.16) 1.14 (1.02 1.27)
 High 0.86 (0.74 1.00) 1.49 (1.27 1.74)
ab Agricultural Occupation
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 2.48 (2.23 2.76) 1.81 (1.59 2.06)
 High 2.90 (2.43 3.45) 2.21 (1.82 2.69)
ab Composite Animal Density Index (CADI)
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 1.96 (1.76 2.18) 1.15 (0.98 1.35)
 High 2.81 (2.42 3.27) 1.68 (1.39 2.02)
bc Cow Density
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 1.83 (1.63 2.05) 1.11 (0.95 1.31)
 High 2.75 (2.41 3.13) 1.54 (1.30 1.83)
bc Pig Density
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 1.86 (1.64 2.11) 1.12 (0.98 1.28)
 High 2.73 (2.19 3.40) 1.99 (1.61 2.46)
bc Chicken Density
 Low – Reference 1.0 1.0
 Medium 1.21 (0.87 1.67) 0.91 (0.68 1.23)
 High 2.58 (2.08 3.19) 2.11 (1.73 2.58)

a Adjusted for all variables except cow, pig and chicken densities in the fully adjusted model

b Adjusted for age group and gender in partially adjusted model

c Adjusted for age group, gender, urban/rural, socio-economic status and agricultural occupation in fully adjusted model

( ) 95% Confidence Intervals, adjusted for model overdispersion

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure