Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec 1;30(23):5213–5221. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf654

Table 2. Comparison of the PHASE.big, PHASE.small and SNPHAP programs using phase known data sets.

Gene name   ApoE     LPL    
Target region (kb)   5.5     9.7    
No. of subjects   96     71    
No. of SNPs   22     69    
No. of heterozygous genotypes   283     1154    
Average no. of heterozygous genotypes per subject   3     16    
Nucleotide diversitya   0.0005 ± 0.0003     0.002 ± 0.001    
Algorithm   PHASE.big PHASE.small SNPHAP PHASE.big PHASE.small SNPHAP
Run time Pre-filterb 2 h 6 h 1 min 3 h 9 days 90 s
  Post-filterc 2 h 6 h 1 min 3 h 7 days 1 min
Accuracy of full haplotyped Pre-filter 74 (77%) 74 (77%) 79 (82%) 37 (52%) 38 (53%) 30 (42%)
  Post-filter 73 (76%) 73 (76%) 77 (80%) 32 (45%) 38 (53%) 27 (39%)
Accuracy of heterozygous genotypese Pre-filter 253 (91%) 253 (91%) 258 (93%) 1051 (91%) 1058 (92%) 1033 (89%)
  Post-filter 252 (91%) 252 (91%) 256 (92%) 1035 (90%) 1053 (91%) 1022 (88%)

aNucleotide diversity data is obtained from previous publications (17,18).

bPre-filter, haplotypes predicted after excluding SNPs with no experimentally determined haplotype phase.

cPost-filter, all SNPs were included in haplotype prediction, but SNPs with no experimentally determined haplotype phase were excluded in the comparison analysis.

dThe number of subjects (or percentage of donors) whose complete haplotypes are correctly constructed.

eThe number of heterozygous genotypes (or percentage of heterozygous genotypes) with correct haplotype phase assignment.