Table 3.
Systematic Review of Four Years of Quasi-designs in JAMIA
| Study | Journal | Informatics Topic Category | Quasi-experimental Design | Limitation of Quasi-design Mentioned in Article |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staggers and Kobus20 | JAMIA | 1 | Counterbalanced study design | Yes |
| Schriger et al.21 | JAMIA | 1 | A5 | Yes |
| Patel et al.22 | JAMIA | 2 | A5 (study 1, phase 1) | No |
| Patel et al.22 | JAMIA | 2 | A2 (study 1, phase 2) | No |
| Borowitz23 | JAMIA | 1 | A2 | No |
| Patterson and Harasym24 | JAMIA | 6 | C1 | Yes |
| Rocha et al.25 | JAMIA | 5 | A2 | Yes |
| Lovis et al.26 | JAMIA | 1 | Counterbalanced study design | No |
| Hersh et al.27 | JAMIA | 6 | B1 | No |
| Makoul et al.28 | JAMIA | 2 | B1 | Yes |
| Ruland29 | JAMIA | 3 | B1 | No |
| DeLusignan et al.30 | JAMIA | 1 | A1 | No |
| Mekhjian et al.31 | JAMIA | 1 | A2 (study design 1) | Yes |
| Mekhjian et al.31 | JAMIA | 1 | B1 (study design 2) | Yes |
| Ammenwerth et al.32 | JAMIA | 1 | A2 | No |
| Oniki et al.33 | JAMIA | 5 | C1 | Yes |
| Liederman and Morefield34 | JAMIA | 1 | A1 (study 1) | No |
| Liederman and Morefield34 | JAMIA | 1 | A2* (study 2) | No |
| Rotich et al.35 | JAMIA | 2 | A2* | No |
| Payne et al.36 | JAMIA | 1 | A1 | No |
| Hoch et al.37 | JAMIA | 3 | A2* | No |
| Laerum et al.38 | JAMIA | 1 | B1 | Yes |
| Devine et al.39 | JAMIA | 1 | Counterbalanced study design | |
| Dunbar et al.40 | JAMIA | 6 | A1 | |
| Lenert et al.41 | JAMIA | 6 | A2 | |
| Koide et al.42 | IJMI | 5 | D4 | No |
| Gonzalez-Hendrich et al.43 | IJMI | 2 | A1 | No |
| Anantharaman and Swee Han44 | IJMI | 3 | B1 | No |
| Chae et al.45 | IJMI | 6 | A2 | No |
| Lin et al.46 | IJMI | 3 | A1 | No |
| Mikulich et al.47 | IJMI | 1 | A2 | Yes |
| Hwang et al.48 | IJMI | 1 | A2 | Yes |
| Park et al.49 | IJMI | 1 | C2 | No |
| Park et al.49 | IJMI | 1 | D4 | No |
JAMIA = Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association; IJMI = International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Could have been analyzed as an interrupted time-series design.