Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec 9;78(2):179–192. doi: 10.1086/499409

Table 4.

Maximal LOD Scores for Each Chromosome Derived from the Genomewide Scan with Recessive and Dominant Disease Models[Note]

Dominant Model
Recessive Model
Chromosomeand Position (cM) Marker LOD θ LOD θ
1:
 179.98 D1S1625 .918 0 1.160 0
 218.46 D1S1678 1.667 0 .513 .1
2:
 47.97 D2S405 .127 .2 .218 .15
 99.41 D2S1777 .708 0 −.172 .2
3:
 89.91 D3S4542 .986 0 1.702 0
4:
 33.96 D4S3340 −.412 .2 .655 0
 60.16 D4S1627 .155 .2 −.515 .2
5:
 168.49 D5S1475 .840 0 .887 .1
6:
 92.85 D6S1270 1.313 0 .040 .2
 102.81 D6S1056 −.063 0 1.480 0
7:
 17.17 D7S2200 .901 0 .112 .2
 103.63 D7S1813 .562 0 .273 .1
8:
 26.43 D8S1106 .400 0 −.484 .2
 94.17 D8S1123 −.159 .2 .005 .15
9:
 163.84 D9S1838 1.834 0 3.341 0
10:
 109.98 D10S1739 1.322 0 .538 .075
 117.42 D10S677 1.489 0 .136 .15
11:
 33.02 ATA34E08 −.141 .2 .409 .2
 123.00 D11S4464 .975 0 .267 .15
12:
 56.38 D12S1663 1.150 0 .247 .15
13:
 63.90 D13S317 .261 .2 −.089 .2
14:
 55.82 D14S587 .753 0 −.059 .2
 105.53 D14S617 −.092 .2 .724 .025
15:
 52.33 D15S643 .202 .1 −.003 .2
 60.17 D15S1507 −.213 .1 .631 .1
16:
 8.16 D16S2622 .225 .2 .692 .025
17:
 .63 D17S1308 −.172 .2 .097 .15
 82.00 D17S1290 .013 .2 .010 .2
18:
 96.48 D18S1270 .728 0 .773 .05
19:
 68.08 D19S178 .417 .15 .329 .1
 92.56 D19S418 .591 .05 .115 .2
20:
 21.15 D20S115 .628 0 −.115 .2
 42.28 D20S471 .089 .2 .123 .2
21:
 36.77 D21S1440 .419 0 .703 .075
22:
 24.74 D22S1167 .503 .1 −.047 .2
 32.39 D22S685 −.155 .2 .173 .2
X:
 52.63 DXS1068 .379 .075 1.027 .001
 165.11 DXS9908 .419 .1 −.120 .2

Note.— See the “Methods” section for a detailed description of the search for the genetic locus of HHRH. LOD scores are not corrected for multiple testing.