Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 27;394(Pt 1):115–124. doi: 10.1042/BJ20051329

Table 2. Comparison of sequence identities.

Amino acid sequence identities (%) of HvUGE1, HvUGE2 and HvUGE3 are compared with barley UDP-Xyl synthases (HvUXS1–HvUXS4) [3], barley UDP-Xyl 4-epimerases (HvUXE1–HvUXE3), HvUGDH, HvUGAE (Q. Zhang and G. B. Fincher, unpublished work), rice UGEs (TIGR Data Bank loci Os05g51670, Os09g15420, Os09g35800 and Os08g28730), a human UGE (PDB entry 1hzj) and A. thaliana UGE1 (Swiss-Prot Data Bank entry Q42605).

Sequence identity (%)
HvUGE1 HvUGE2 HvUGE3
HvUGE1 100
HvUGE2 74 100
HvUGE3 63 60 100
HvUXS1 26 27 20
HvUXS2 28 27 26
HvUXS3 28 29 27
HvUXS4 29 28 24
HvUXE1 41 41 37
HvUXE2 42 42 40
HvUXE3 40 39 39
HvUGDH 21 17 21
HvUGlcAE 25 27 21
Rice Os05g51670 90 76 63
Rice Os09g15420 74 87 60
Rice Os09g35800 61 62 79
Rice Os08g28730 76 82 63
Human UGE 59 55 54
A. thaliana UGE1 66 61 72