Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov 24;6(Suppl 1):18–23. doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0314-1

Table 1.

Documents defining the English Health Basket, 2005

Catalogue: type of document, actors and contents Criteria used for defining benefits
Type of document Legally binding Positive/negative definition of benefits Degree of explicitnessa Updating N C E CE B Other
Acts of Parliament Yes P 1 Irregular, amended by further legislation + Political judgement ‘necessary to meet all reasonable requirements’
Statutory instruments (SI) Yes P or N 1–3 Irregular, amended by further legislation + + + + Safety
Directions Yes P 2 No + + +
National Service Frameworks No P 2 or 3 Unclear + +
NICE technology appraisals Yesb P or N 3 Every 4 years + + +
NICE clinical guidelines No P 2 or 3 Every 4 to 6 years + + +
NICE interventional procedures No P or N 3 Unclear + Safety
Contracts Yes P 1–3 Infrequent-although small amendments more frequent + +
Waiting time guaranteesc No P 2 Irregular + +
HRG tariffs No P 2 or 3 Still evolving + +
Devices tariff No P 3 Monthly + + + Safety, quality, appropriateness
Fee schedules No P 3 Annually (at least) + +

N need, C costs, E effectiveness, CE cost-effectiveness, B budget (from [1, 2, 3], DH website (http://www.dh.gov.uk/home/fs/en), HMSO website (http://www.hmso.gov.uk/), expert advice (see Acknowledgements))

a “Explicit is subdivided as 1: all necessary”; 2: areas of care; 3: items.

b The statutory duty is upon PCTs to ensure funding is available to facilitate implementation, not upon doctors to adopt the approved technology.

c The dominant instrument for securing these are performance ratings prepared by the Healthcare Commission.