Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;171(4):1605–1615. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.048041

TABLE 1.

Suppressor alleles identified by Tax et al. (1997) and our screen

Gene Taxet al. (1997) Our study % suppresseda
lin-12b 109 247 ND
sup-17 5 10 52 (n = 353)c
lag-2 2 0d 94 (n = 189)c
sel-6 2 0 90c
sel-5e 2 13 51c
sel-4 1 1 31c
sel-8 1 0 25c
sel-7 1 6 53c
sel(ar526) 0 1 10 (n = 68)f
lag-1g 0 1 73 (n = 19)f
bre-5(ar560) 0 1 4 (n = 193)f
sel(ar562) 0 1 37 (n = 49)f
sel(ar584) 0 1 17 (n = 51)f
sel(ar522, ar570) 0 2 17 (n = 93)f
sel(ar578) 0 1 5 (n = 40)f
a

Suppression of the lin-12(n302) egg-laying defect by the most penetrant allele of each sel gene.

b

Sequence changes associated with new alleles of lin-12:ar563, E492K; ar564, R721Q; and ar575, K1127E.

c

Suppression of egg laying by the most penetrant allele. Data are from Tax et al. (1997).

d

lag-2 alleles recovered by Tax et al. (1997) were dominant and would have been eliminated by our triage step.

e

Sequence changes associated with new alleles of sel-5: ar568, Q551stop; ar571, g → a acceptor splice-site mutation; ar574, R91stop; ar579, 525-bp deletion within the coding region; and ar588, g → a acceptor splice-site mutation.

f

Animals were also homozygous for unc-36(e251).

g

lag-1(ar519) encodes the L302F change.