Table 5.
Methylation Alterationb
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Probe | Primer (HM+4/E+3)a | Fragment Size (bp) | Origin of the Fragment | F1 | Amphiploid | Copy Number | Sequence Similarityc |
MIF1 | E+AAG | 210 | sharonensis | + | + | High | Barley retrotransposon |
MIF2 | E+AAG | 260 | aegilopoides | + | + | Low | None |
MIF3 | E+AGG | 100 | sharonensis | + | + | High | Barley retrotransposon |
MIF4 | E+AGG | 150 | aegilopoides | + | + | High |
Ceratitis capitata unknown repetitive DNA fragment |
MIF5 | E+ACA | 134 | aegilopoides | + | + | High | None |
MIF6 | E+AAG | 350 | aegilopoides | − | + | Low | None |
MIF7 | E+ACT | 110 | aegilopoides | − | + | High | None |
MIF8 | E+ACT | 240 | sharonensis | − | + | Low | None |
MIF9 | E+ACA | 270 | aegilopoides | − | + | High | None |
MIF10 | E+ACC | 120 | aegilopoides | − | + | Low | None |
MIF11 | E+ACC | 405 | aegilopoides | − | + | Low | None |
MIF12 | E+ACC | 275 | aegilopoides | − | + | High | None |
The selective primer HM+4 (5′-CATGAGTCCTGCTCGGTCAA [HM+TCCA]) was used in combination with each of the four E+3 primers listed. The core sequence of EcoRI is identical to that used in the AFLP protocol by Vos et al. (1995).
+, methylation alteration; −, no alteration.
Similarity was considered significant for e values ≤ 0.005.