Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb;44(2):525–528. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.2.525-528.2006

TABLE 2.

Distribution of the number of H. influenzae isolates by single sampling method and combinations of sampling methods, in the two patient groups and for the merged group

Sampling method(s)a No. of subjects positive for H. influenzae
Controls (n = 200) Patients (n = 300) Merged data (%b) (n = 500)
OPS 6 13 19 (49)
NPS 4 8 12c (31)
NPW 5 17 22 (56)
NPS and/or NPW 5 20 25d (64)
OPS and/or NPS 9 20 29 (74)
OPS and/or NPW 10 26 36 (92)
OPS and/or NPS and/or NPW 10 29 39 (100)
a

OPS, oropharyngeal swab; NPS, nasopharyngeal swab; NPW, nasopharyngeal washing.

b

Percentage of isolates from the group of subjects positive for H. influenzae by at least one of the three sampling methods.

c

P < 0.04 compared to NPW.

d

Nonsignificant compared to OPS.