TABLE 1.
Antibiotic (concn [μg/ml]) | MGIT 960 resulta | RRM resulta
|
Overall agreement (%) | Sensitivityb (%) | Specificityc (%) | PPVd (%) | NPVe (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | R | |||||||
STR (1.0) | S | 37 | 6 | 97 | 96 | 100 | 100 | 86 |
R | 157 | |||||||
STR (4.0) | S | 82 | 16 | 92 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 84 |
R | 102 | |||||||
INH (0.1) | S | 30 | 3f | 99 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 91 |
R | 167 | |||||||
INH (0.4) | S | 31 | 3f | 99 | 98 | 100 | 100 | 91 |
R | 166 | |||||||
RIF (1.0) | S | 68 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
R | 132 | |||||||
EMB (5.0) | S | 103 | 71 | 65 | 27 | 100 | 100 | 59 |
R | 26 | |||||||
EMB (7.5) | S | 156 | 33 | 84 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 83 |
R | 11 | |||||||
PZA (100)g | S | 158 | 8 | 92 | 77 | 98 | 90 | 95 |
R | 3 | 26 |
S, susceptible; R, resistant. Values are numbers of isolates.
The sensitivity, i.e., the ability of MGIT 960 to detect true resistance compared with the RRM results.
The specificity, i.e., the ability of MGIT 960 to detect true susceptibility compared with the RRM results.
PPV, positive predictive value.
NPV, negative predictive value.
Mixed cultures (consisting of resistant and susceptible subpopulations).
Five M. tuberculosis isolates did not grow in one of the systems used.