Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;44(3):899–908. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.899-908.2006

TABLE 5.

Results of M. pneumoniae detection on individual samples in 2002

Sample no. and test description Input (CCU/100 μl) Laboratory no. and test resulte
% Positiveb
6 11 1a 9 4 12 2 3 5 8 7 10
B-001 5,000 + + + + + + + + + + + 100
B-005 5,000 + + + + + + + + + + + 100
B-010 5,000 + + + + + + + + + + + 100
B-002 500 + + + + + + + + + + + 100
A-004 500 + + + + + + + 66.7
A-007 500 + + + + + + + 66.7
A-010 500 + + + + + + 58.3
B-003 500 + + + + + 50.0
B-008 500 + + + + + inh 45.5
A-001 50 + + + + + 50.0
A-009 50 + + inh + 27.3
A-002 50 + + 16.7
A-003 0 + + 16.7
A-008 0 inh + 9.1
A-006 0 + 8.3
B-004 0 + 8.3
A-005 0 0
B-006 0 0
B-007 0 0
B-009 0 0
% Correct results 95.0 95.0 85.0 80.0 77.8 75.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 63.2 60.0 40.0
Routine-application NAATc Y Y Y N Y Y N Y Y NS N Y
No. of samples tested monthlyd 2 1 3 0 0 3 2 2 1 1 0 1
a

Identical results were obtained by detection by real-time mono-NASBA and by electrochemiluminescence.

b

No. 10 was excluded from analysis.

c

All operations were performed in separate rooms, except for participant 7, who used a single room.

d

0 = 0; 1 = 1 to 10 samples monthly; 2 = 11 to 45; 3 is more than 50.

e

inh, inhibition.