Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;72(3):2031–2042. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2031-2042.2006

TABLE 6.

Detection of V. parahaemolyticus in seeded oysters with overnight enrichmenta

Amt of V. parahaemolyticus seeded (CFU) Final V. parahamolyticus concn (109 CFU/ml)b Ct value
tlh ORF8 tdh trh
105 3.88 18.94 ± 1.38 17.87 ± 2.03 16.75 ± 1.41 18.18 ± 1.57
104 4.20 19.33 ± 0.85 19.55 ± 0.59 17.24 ± 0.84 18.57 ± 1.22
103 2.80 19.36 ± 0.75 24.37 ± 2.26 17.55 ± 0.92 18.16 ± 1.03
102 4.65 20.08 ± 0.49 19.02 ± 0.97 17.40 ± 0.70 19.54 ± 0.93
101 4.00 19.55 ± 0.67 18.38 ± 0.86 17.18 ± 0.88 19.56 ± 1.31
100 3.30 20.84 ± 0.93 19.71 ± 0.50 18.61 ± 0.95 19.21 ± 1.44
0 NDc NDc ND ND ND
Positive controld 18.98 ± 0.42 18.16 ± 0.40 17.23 ± 0.40 19.29 ± 0.41
Negative controle ND ND ND ND
a

The data are means ± standard deviations for four independent experiments.

b

The viable plate count is an average for three dilutions.

c

ND, not detected.

d

The positive amplification control included 100 ng purified V. parahaemolyticus genomic DNA.

e

The negative amplification control included 3 μl sterile water.