Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar;80(5):2151–2161. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.5.2151-2161.2006

TABLE 2.

Replication studies in Chinese ring-necked pheasants

Virus Method of infection No. of birds positive 5 dpi/total no. of birds
No. of days of virus shed
Trachea Cloaca
DK H1 Inoculated 2/3 2/3 14a
Contact 1/2 2/2 10
DK H2 Inoculated 0/3 2/3 20b
Contact 0/2 1/2 18
DK H3 Inoculated 2/3 2/3 10
Contact 1/2 1/2 14a
Mal H3 Inoculated 2/3 3/3 14a
Contact 1/2 2/2 10
DK H4 Inoculated 3/3 3/3 14a
Contact 0/2 1/2 10
Mal H4 Inoculated 3/3 3/3 7
Contact 1/2 2/2 7
DK H5 Inoculated 1/3 1/3 14a
Contact 0/2 1/2 20b
DK H6 Inoculated 3/3 3/3 7
Contact 1/2 1/2 10
Mal H6 Inoculated 2/3 3/3 14a
Contact 2/2 2/2 12
Mal H7 Inoculated 3/3 3/3 20b
Contact 2/2 2/2 16
Mal H8 Inoculated 2/3 2/3 16
Contact 1/2 2/2 18
DK H9 Inoculated 3/3 2/3 7
Contact 2/2 1/2 7
DK H10 Inoculated 3/3 3/3 18
Contact 2/2 2/2 45
Mal H11 Inoculated 3/3 1/3 14
Contact 0/2 0/2 16
DK H11 Inoculated 1/3 3/3 10
Contact 1/2 1/2 10
DK H12 Inoculated 3/3 2/3 20
Contact 1/2 2/2 23
Gull H13 Inoculated 3/3 0/3 7
Contact 0/2 0/2 0
Mal H14 Inoculated 3/3 0/3 23
Contact 0/2 0/2 0
SW H15 Inoculated 2/3 0/3 5
Contact 1/2 0/2 7
a

Birds were monitored for only 14 dpi.

b

Birds were monitored for only 21 dpi.