Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Mar 10.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Dec;29(12):2170–2180. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000191763.56873.c4

Table 1.

Means and p-Values Comparing Driver History Data for Telephone Survey Respondents, Refusals, and Non-Contacts a

Variables in Response Model Respondents (n = 1528) Refusals (n = 528) Non- Contacts (n = 1383) p-value
Age in years 17.10 17.14 16.97 0.0004
Proportion male 0.47 0.60 0.53 <.0001
Proportion living with single parent 0.20 0.21 0.27 <.0001
Proportion living with step/other parent 0.16 0.15 0.22 <.0001
Alcohol use/misuseb 2.75 2.80 2.83 0.3423
Alcohol availabilityc 3.38 3.37 3.33 0.5293
Intent to drink/next two yearsd 2.75 2.71 2.71 0.2535
Intent to drink/age 21d 2.83 2.79 2.77 0.1247
Cigarette usee 1.40 1.29 1.60 0.0003
Marijuana usee 0.58 0.61 0.78 0.0004
School gradesf 8.28 8.15 8.00 <.0001
Proportion with serious crash 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.6197
Proportion with serious offense 0.41 0.48 0.48 0.0074
Proportion with offense prior to licensure 0.02 0.05 0.06 <.0001
a

For 3,439 of the 4,230 study subjects, 12th grade questionnaire data were available.

b

Scale: 1 = no alcohol use, to 4 = alcohol misuse two or more times.

c

Scale: 1 = very hard to get, to 4 = very easy to get.

d

Scale: 1 = definitely not, to 4 = definitely will.

e

Scale: 0 = no use, to 5 = use every day.

f

Scale: 1 = mostly F's, to 9 = mostly A's.