Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 11;332(7541):574–578. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38738.473252.7C

Table 3.

Treatment outcomes of new patients with sputum smear positive for acid fast bacilli treated by private practitioner administered directly observed treatment in public-private mix pilot projects, India 2000-02

Public-private mix project (state) Evaluation period* Total No of new case notifications Cured (%) Completed treatment (%) Died (%) Failed treatment (%) Defaulted (%) Transferred (%) Treatment success (%)
Private practitioners
Delhi LRS (New Dehli) Jan to Mar 2001 20 18 (90) 0 0 1 (5) 1 (5) 0 90
Kannur (Kerala) Jan 2001 to Jun 2002 85 78 (92) 0 2 (2) 1 (1) 4 (5) 0 92
Mumbai (Maharashtra) Apr to Dec 2002 296 181 (61) 58 (20) 7 (2) 15 (5) 35 (12) 0 81
Thane Municipal (Maharashtra) Jan 2001 to Mar 2002 215 168 (78) 0 10 (5) 14 (7) 22 (10) 1 (0) 78
Thane Rural (Maharashtra) Jul 2001 to Jun 2002 63 55 (87) 0 4 (6) 0 (0) 3 (5) 1 (2) 87
Corporate and non-governmental organisation
Mahavir (Andhra Pradesh) Jan 1995 to Dec 1999 161 143 (89) 1 (0) 3 (2) 6 (4) 8 (5) 0 90
Tea Estates (Assam and West Bengal) Jan 2001 to Mar 2002 1925 1604 (83) 17 (1) 126 (7) 99 (5) 77 (4) 2 (0) 84
Falah-e-Am (Uttar Pradesh) Jul 2001 to Jun 2002 1040 979 (94) 4 (0) 26 (3) 2 (0) 30 (3) 0 94
NDTB (New Dehli) Jan 1999 to Dec 2001 584 508 (87) 1 (0) 14 (2) 29 (5) 28 (5) 4 (1) 87
RK Mission (New Delhi) Jan 1999 to Dec 2001 1429 1217 85) 0 40 (3) 64 (4) 68 (5) 40 (3) 85
Leprosy Rural (Tamil Nadu) Jul 2000 to Dec 2002 472 420 (89) 0 28 (6) 16 (3) 4 (1) 4 (1) 89
St Mary's Leprosy (Tamil Nadu) Jul 2000 to Dec 2002 623 514 (82) 49 (8) 51 (8) 4 (1) 4 (1) 0 91

See table 1 for definitions.

*

Patients included if notification as case of tuberculosis and initiation of treatment occurred in specified evaluation period.

Proportion of patients documented as cured or completed treatment.