Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 16;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-4

Table 3.

Comparison of articles identified through Science Citation Index and PubMed searches until the end of 2003

Search method(s) that identified article PubMed and Science Citation Index (n = 31) Science Citation Index only (n = 11) PubMed only (n = 8)
 Mean (s.d.) 1999 (6.4) 1996 (7.9) 1997 (9.9)
 Median (range) 2002 (1969–2003) 2001 (1982–2003) 2001 (1973–2002)
Impact factor
 Mean (s.d.)* 4.2 (2.8) 9.5 (9.8) 3.9 (2.6)
 Median (range) 3.2 (1.1–10.5) 3.8 (2.0–31.7) 2.8 (1.3–7.6)
Study Type 8 aetiologic 23 prognostic 3 aetiologic 8 prognostic 2 aetiologic 6 prognostic
Classification of outcome** 25 positive 6 null 5 positive 6 null 6 positive 2 null
Sample size: aetiologic studies
  Mean (s.d.) 4502 (3331) 5758 (4397) 1101 (1089)
 Median (range) 3269 (76–9758) 7217 (817–9239) 1101 (332–1870)
Sample size: prognostic studies
  Mean (s.d.) 525 (626) 832 (925) 399 (441)
 Median (range) 344 (30–2885) 552 (58–2320) 288 (66–1250)

* Four articles were published in journals with no impact factor (1 both methods, 1 Science Citation Index only, 2 PubMed only).

**Statistically significant result at the p < 0.05 level.