Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Mar 20.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):490–525. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.490

Table 10.

Correlations Between Corpus Statistics, Typicality Ratings, and Reading Time Differences

Sentence source
Correlations Trueswell et al. (1994) Corpus, Set 1 Corpus, Set 2 MacDonald (1994) McRae et al(1998).
Corpus statistics
 A: Probability of animate agent −.33 −.41 .23 −.28
 B: Probability of animate patient .24 .30 .02 −.42
 A – B −.37 −.39 .15 .17
Typicality ratings
 A: Typicality of animate agent – typicality of animate patient −.18 −.53 −.50 −.37 .29
 B: Typicality of inanimate agent – typicality of inanimate patient .24 .09 −.57 −.46 −.15
 A − B −.31 −.53 .19 −.03 .27

Note. “Correlations” refers to reading time differences between reduced relatives with animate heads versus reduced relatives with inanimate heads correlated with the entries in the first column. All the sets of sentences except McRae et al. compared animate heads with inanimate heads. McRae et al. compared typically agent heads with typically patient heads.