Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent expansions in eligibility for coverage of prenatal care services by the Medicaid program reflect national initiatives to improve pregnancy outcomes. This study investigates the potential impact that completeness of reporting of prenatal care and gestational age variables and strategies to impute missing data may have on evaluations of the Medicaid expansion. METHODS: This study, examining 15 years of vital record data from a single state and comparing 1 year of data from four mid-Atlantic states, selected single live births to resident mothers for analyses. The "day 15" and the "preceding case" methods were used to impute missing gestational age data. RESULTS: Considerable temporal and geographic variation was detected in completeness of reporting of variables used to construct prenatal care indices. After imputing values for cases with missing data, the proportion of cases for which adequacy of prenatal care utilization could not be determined ranged from 3% to 24% among the states investigated. For those cases where gestational age data could be imputed, the distribution of prenatal care utilization was not markedly disparate from those cases with complete reporting of gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that variations in reporting, decisions regarding the treatment of missing data, and the choice of the denominator can alter prenatal care utilization percentages and have implications for evaluations of the impact of the recent Medicaid expansion on prenatal care utilization.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexander G. R., Cornely D. A. Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome. Am J Prev Med. 1987 Sep-Oct;3(5):243–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexander G. R., Cornely D. A. Racial disparities in pregnancy outcomes: the role of prenatal care utilization and maternal risk status. Am J Prev Med. 1987 Sep-Oct;3(5):254–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexander G. R., Tompkins M. E., Cornely D. A. Gestational age reporting and preterm delivery. Public Health Rep. 1990 May-Jun;105(3):267–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on fetus and newborn. Nomenclature for duration of gestation, birth weight and intra-uterine growth. Pediatrics. 1967 Jun;39(6):935–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- David R. J. Population-based intrauterine growth curves from computerized birth certificates. South Med J. 1983 Nov;76(11):1401–1406. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198311000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gortmaker S. L. The effects of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn. Am J Public Health. 1979 Jul;69(7):653–660. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.7.653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald T. P., Coburn A. F. Predictors of prenatal care utilization. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(2):167–172. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray J. L., Bernfield M. The differential effect of prenatal care on the incidence of low birth weight among blacks and whites in a prepaid health care plan. N Engl J Med. 1988 Nov 24;319(21):1385–1391. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198811243192105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Showstack J. A., Budetti P. P., Minkler D. Factors associated with birthweight: an exploration of the roles of prenatal care and length of gestation. Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):1003–1008. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams R. L., Creasy R. K., Cunningham G. C., Hawes W. E., Norris F. D., Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):624–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]