Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience : JPN logoLink to Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience : JPN
. 2000 Mar;25(2):178–184.

An examination of the sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in a sample of patients suffering from major depressive disorder.

C L Hooper 1, D Bakish 1
PMCID: PMC1408065  PMID: 10740991

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity of the 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD6) with the more widely used 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD17) in patients suffering from major depressive disorder, with or without melancholia and/or dysthymic disorder. A secondary objective was to compare the sensitivity of the HRSD6 to the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 4 clinical trials that tested antidepressant therapies. SETTING: Outpatient treatment in a major psychiatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and forty-three male and female outpatients meeting the criteria of the DSM-III-R or DSM-IV for major depressive disorder. OUTCOME MEASURES: HRSD17, HRSD6 and MADRS. RESULTS: The HRSD6 correlated strongly with the HRSD17, both at baseline and termination of treatment, and for the subgroups of double depression and melancholia. The HRSD6 was also correlated significantly with the MADRS at both measurement times, and for the subgroups. Paired t-tests with the HRSD6, HRSD17 and MADRS demonstrated equal sensitivity to change over the course of treatment, both in the full sample and in the dysthymic and melancholic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: The HRSD6 appears to be as sensitive to change over treatment as the HRSD17 and the MADRS. A shorter, less time-consuming measure of depression may have utility in clinical practice and research.

Full text

PDF
178

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bech P., Allerup P., Gram L. F., Reisby N., Rosenberg R., Jacobsen O., Nagy A. The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 Mar;63(3):290–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1981.tb00676.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bech P., Bolwig T. G., Kramp P., Rafaelsen O. J. The Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979 Apr;59(4):420–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb04484.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bech P., Gram L. F., Dein E., Jacobsen O., Vitger J., Bolwig T. G. Quantitative rating of depressive states. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1975 Mar;51(3):161–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1975.tb00002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HAMILTON M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50–55. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hammond M. F. Rating depression severity in the elderly physically ill patient: reliability and factor structure of the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;13(4):257–261. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199804)13:4<257::aid-gps773>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lapierre Y. D., Silverstone P., Reesal R. T., Saxena B., Turner P., Bakish D., Plamondon J., Vincent P. M., Remick R. A., Kroft C. A Canadian multicenter study of three fixed doses of controlled-release ipsapirone in outpatients with moderate to severe major depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1998 Aug;18(4):268–273. doi: 10.1097/00004714-199808000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Linden M., Borchelt M., Barnow S., Geiselmann B. The impact of somatic morbidity on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in the very old. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Aug;92(2):150–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Montgomery S. A., Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382–389. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Sullivan R. L., Fava M., Agustin C., Baer L., Rosenbaum J. F. Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 May;95(5):379–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09649.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Riskind J. H., Beck A. T., Brown G., Steer R. A. Taking the measure of anxiety and depression. Validity of the reconstructed Hamilton scales. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Aug;175(8):474–479. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198708000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES