Skip to main content
. 2003 Jan 13;100(2):567–571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0233733100

Table 1.

Parameters used in model and the results of sensitivity analysis in which the density of each species was increased by 20%

Species Body burden
Molting percentage*
Reservoir competence*
Density, no. per hectare Density source Sensitivity of NIP to increase in host density, percent change
Mean (SE) N Mean % (SE) N Mean % (SE) N
White-footed mouse 27.8 (3.3) 28   41.5 (3.5) 47   92.1 (2.9) 15   0–100 Original data NA
Eastern chipmunk 36.0 (11) 57 41.2 (6.0) 43 55.0 (6.4) 20  0–50 Original data 0.41%
White-tailed deer 239 (99) 12 56.3 (9.0) 5 4.6 (2.3) 19 0.25 Original data −0.22%
Raccoon 127 (30) 12 36.5 (7.3) 13 1.3 (0.6) 12 0.2 Literature −0.07%
Virginia opossum 254 (115) 21 44.1 (5.3) 19 2.6 (1.1) 18 1 Literature −0.78%
Striped skunk 66.8 (12.7) 4 63.9 (11) 4 9.7 (8.4) 4 0.05 Literature −0.01%
Short-tailed shrew 62.9 (17.3) 42 46.8 (4.5) 41 41.8 (6.7) 33 25 Literature 0.31%
Birds 1.7 (0.4) 74 33.9 (NA) 34 11.7 (NA) 1,133 31.6 Original and literature −0.14%
Sorex shrews 55.5 (32) 8 49.6 (11) 7 51.2 (15) 6 25 Literature 1.4%
Red and grey squirrel 142 (58) 10 59.3 (11) 9 14.7 (5.1) 8 8.1 Literature −3.1%

NA, not applicable. 

*

Mean percentages per host, with the exception of birds. Body burdens of birds were frequently <5; therefore, gross percentages were substituted for means across individuals. 

Sensitivity analysis performed at the long-term average mouse density of ≈20 mice per hectare. 

Birds are American robin, ovenbird, veery, and wood thrush.