TABLE 1.

Effect of ban transgenes on ph⁴¹⁰ ESC phenotype^a

Line no.	Cross	Genotype	Mean no. of sex comb teeth	Legs analyzed (n)b	Distribution of legsc
					0-2	3-5	≥6
1	ph410w/ph410w; banl(2)k02512/CyO × pBB10/+	ph410w/Y; CyO/+	2.6	112	62	42	8
2		ph410w/Y; pBB10/CyO	1.3	111	92	16	3
3		ph410w/Y;banl(2)k02512/+	5.8	110	5	43	62
4		ph410w/Y;banl(2)k02512/pBB10	2.4	106	54	49	3
5	ph410w/ph410w; banl(2)k02512/+ × pBB22/CyO	ph410w/Y; CyO/+	3.1	110	47	53	10
6		ph410w/Y; pBB22/+	2.0	109	74	32	3
7		ph410w/Y;banl(2)k02512/CyO	5.8	115	9	39	67
8		ph410w/Y;banl(2)k02512/pBB22	3.8	109	34	51	24
9	ph410w/ph410w; banl(2)k02512/CyO; da:Gal4/da:Gal4 × UBG47/+	ph410w/Y; CyO/+; da:Gal4/+	3.6	55	13	33	9
10		ph410w/Y; UBG47/CyO; da:Gal4/+	1.7	80	56	23	1
11		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/+; da:Gal4/+	7.7	56	0	4	52
12		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/UBG47; da:Gal4/+	2.5	76	40	33	3
13	ph410w/ph410w; banl(2)k02512/+; da:Gal4/da:Gal4 × UBFc/CyO	ph410w/Y; CyO/+; da:Gal4/+	3.4	119	39	57	23
14		ph410w/Y; UBFc/+; da:Gal4/+	1.2	118	104	14	0
15		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/CyO; da:Gal4/+	6.0	80	1	33	46
16		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/UBFc; da:Gal4/+	2.1	117	81	32	4
17	ph410w/ph410w; banl(2)k02512/CyO; da:Gal4/+ × UBG47/UBG47	ph410w/Y; UBG47/CyO	3.7	50	13	27	10
18		ph410w/Y; UBG47/CyO: da:Gal4/+	1.4	34	27	6	1
19		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/UBG47	6.9	52	1	13	38
20		ph410w/Y; banl(2)k02512/UBG47; da:Gal4/+	2.1	39	29	6	4
21	ph410w/ph410w; da:Gal4/+ × UBFc/UBFc	ph410w/Y; UBFc/+	3.0	118	53	47	18
22		ph410w/Y; UBFc/+: da:Gal4/+	0.8	119	112	6	1

^aThe esc phenotype was scored as the average number of sex comb teeth on the metathoracic legs of the males. Sibling males of the appropriate genotype were compared. Males were sorted according to their CyO phenotype, their eye color, and, when necessary, the expression of GFP.

^bn, number of legs analyzed for each genotype.

^cThe distributions of legs in the three classes (0 to 2, 3 to 5, or ≥6 sex comb teeth per leg) were compared for each pair of genotypes analyzed using the chi-square test (P < 0.001).