Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 3;7:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-40

Table 1.

Identifying modules that repeated from one dataset to another

Ontology term rRNA Prot Ubiq

DNA Dmg Env Stress Cell Cycle DNA Dmg Env Stress Cell Cycle DNA Dmg Env Stress Cell Cycle
35S primary transcript processing 1E-17 8.8E-16 7.5E-16 0.17 0.51 0.52 0.26 1 0.16
processing of 20S pre-rRNA 2E-32 5E-19 3.8E-32 0.018 0.37 1 0.17 1 0.11
ribosomal large subunit biogenesis 9.6E-13 0.0000071 3.5E-15 0.38 1 0.38 1 1 0.62
rRNA modification 2.1E-08 0.0043 0.00014 0.66 0.019 0.00066 1 1 0.62
rRNA processing 1.2E-25 1.6E-16 2.5E-23 0.48 1 0.62 0.11 1 0.046
protein biosynthesis 0.0001 1.1E-11 0.0023 5.9E-83 5.6E-108 1.4E-80 0.53 0.42 0.00033
translational elongation 0.62 0.14 0.63 2.1E-08 3E-08 1.7E-09 1 1 0.64
translational initiation 0.19 1 0.025 0.000017 1.8E-14 3.4E-07 0.41 1 0.25
ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolism 0.039 0.02 0.071 0.027 0.048 0.018 2.5E-25 7.3E-25 6.3E-17
ATP-dependent RNA helicase activity 7.2E-11 9.2E-08 4.1E-11 0.39 0.62 1 1 1 0.62
DNA-directed RNA polymerase activity 6.1E-13 4E-08 1.4E-09 0.77 0.012 0.13 0.42 1 0.4
snoRNA binding 1.3E-27 7.6E-17 2.4E-25 0.042 0.51 0.76 0.42 1 0.16
structural constituent of ribosome 0.00012 2.2E-11 0.000078 3.1E-92 5.3E-117 1.8E-95 0.097 0.41 0.0021
translation initiation factor activity 0.16 0.48 0.14 4.7E-08 5.5E-17 2.3E-10 1 1 0.39
endopeptidase activity 0.25 0.21 0.62 0.16 0.62 0.39 9.2E-21 2.6E-18 2.7E-11
nucleolus 1.6E-48 3.4E-29 1.3E-45 0.18 0.65 0.84 0.021 0.48 0.0056
nucleus 1.2E-18 8.3E-13 7.8E-10 0.0053 2.1E-07 0.12 0.0048 1 0.033
small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein complex 7.9E-20 2.8E-09 1.3E-14 0.16 0.67 0.42 0.63 1 0.39
cytosolic large ribosomal subunit 0.03 0.0000016 0.0087 2.1E-65 3.4E-75 6.1E-67 0.021 1 0.0056
cytosolic small ribosomal subunit 0.059 0.0013 0.26 1.5E-41 1.2E-47 4.6E-42 0.073 1 0.03
ribosome 1 0.39 0.3 2.7E-09 6.2E-14 3.7E-09 1 1 0.62

*For each module in each dataset analyzed, an EASE analysis [25] was performed by using Fisher's exact test and the resulting p-values were placed into the table based on the prevalence of the GO (Gene Ontology) term being searched for. The most significant enrichments for a given term are indicated in italics