Skip to main content
. 2006 Feb 13;103(8):2736–2739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511083103

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Episodic incompleteness of the fossil record can cause a rapid recovery from extinction to appear delayed. (a) Complete preservation: an extinction pulse at ti−1 followed immediately by complete recovery (origination pulse) at ti. (b) Uniform, incomplete preservation: assuming an exponential distribution of waiting times between a fossil’s apparent and true extinction (6), the pulse of extinction at ti−1 (dark purple) is smeared over ti−2 and ti−3 (lighter purple); the analogous argument applies to origination (blue). Nonetheless, the origination distribution’s peak at ti still immediately follows the extinction distribution’s peak at ti−1, leaving temporal correlations qualitatively unchanged relative to the case of complete preservation. (c) Episodic, incomplete preservation: preservability in the time interval ti immediately after an extinction at ti−1 is often comparatively low (13), so that taxa that actually originated during ti will be reported to have originated in ti+1 and ti+2. This drop in preservability at ti further decreases the reported origination rate at ti (blue arrow) while concomitantly increasing the apparent rates in ti+1 and ti+2 (white arrows), creating the artifactual temporal lag/delay in time of recovery from extinction that appears in Sepkoski’s data (13).