Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;64(4):610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.008

Table 2.

Distraction site displacement (mean value) during mastication (Group 2)

Left Chew Displacement (mm)
Right chew Displacement (mm)
Total Mobility (mm)
Pig No. Pig Weight (Kg) Chewing side (L/R) SL IL IM SL IL IM SL IL IM
17 16.0 30/26 ND ND −0.37 ND ND −0.18 ND ND 0.37
18 16.0 25/0 ND ND −0.44 ND ND ND ND ND 0.44
19 12.2 20/4 0.21 −0.07 −0.27 −0.36 0.11 0.10 0.57 0.18 0.37
20 15.6 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
21 6.8 30/5 0.33 −0.14 −0.14 −0.33 0.09 −0.12 0.66 0.23 0.14
22 5.4 22/0 0.19 −0.19 −0.14 ND ND ND 0.19 0.19 0.14
23 4.1 37/7 0.36 −0.11 −0.30 0.35 −0.08 −0.18 0.36 0.11 0.30
24 7.2 14/0 0.09 −0.09 −0.19 ND ND ND 0.09 0.09 0.19
25 15.8 21/0 0.19 −0.52 −0.42 ND ND ND 0.19 0.52 0.42
26 12.7 26/8 0.28 −0.01 ND −0.15 −0.57 ND 0.43 0.57 ND
27 22.6 21/0 0.25 −0.26 −0.30 ND ND ND 0.25 0.26 0.30
28 21.8 33/9 0.21 −0.30 −0.35 −0.17 −0.22 −0.26 0.38 0.30 0.35

(L/R): number of left and right cycles analyzed.

assumed all left cycles due to lack of EMG.

the larger value if left and right chews had the same polarity or the sum of absolute values if polarities were opposite. ND, no data.