TABLE 4.

Evaluation of the full model using the bootstrap procedure

Parameter	Full modela	Bootstrapb	95% PI	Difference (%)c
Structural model
θCL (l · h−1)	0.44	0.44	0.36-0.51	−0.9
θV1 (l)	3.12	3.34	2.29-4.39	7.1
θQ (l · h−1)	0.73	0.73	0.53-0.93	0.1
θV2 (l)	18.0	18.7	13.4-23.9	3.6
θCL ≈ WT (kg−1)d	0.0152	0.0151	0.0067-0.0236	−0.7
θV1 ≈ WT (kg−1)e	0.0241	0.0223	0.0118-0.0329	−7.5
Statistical modelf
ω2CL	0.0108	0.0103	0.0005-0.0201	−4.6
ω2V1		0.0450	0.0001-0.0900
ω2Q	0.593	0.591	0.320-0.861	−0.4
ω2V2	0.546	0.537	0.184-0.889	−1.7
π2CL	0.209	0.189	0.067-0.312	−9.5
π2V1	0.319	0.312	0.062-0.561	−2.3
σ2add	0.0011	0.0014	0.0002-0.0025	22.1
σ2prop	0.0709	0.0707	0.0556-0.0857	−0.3

^aMean estimates from the original data set.

^bMean estimates from 1,000 bootstrap analyses.

^cResults are shown as (bootstrap value − full model value)/full model value × 100.

^dEffect of WT on CL.

^eEffect of WT on V₁.

^fω², random effect parameter that represents interindividual variance; π², random effect parameter that represents between occasion variance; σ², random effect parameter that represents residual variance.