Skip to main content
. 2002 Apr;37(2):315–340. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.025

Table 5.

Access Change through Wave 5 – Model I and II Compared to FFS

Direct Capitation MBHO


Access Variables W2–W1 W3–W1 W4–W1 W5–W1 W2–W1 W3–W1 W4–W1 W5–W1
Services refused, discontinued, or reduceda 0.40 (0.39) 0.68* (0.37) 0.71 (0.44) 0.95** (0.42) 0.59 (0.37) −0.13 (0.38) 0.28 (0.45) 0.35 (0.44)
Services more often or longera 0.23 (0.37) −0.15 (0.41) 0.20 (0.44) 0.21 (0.40) −0.58 (0.38) 1.01** (0.41) −0.09 (0.43) −0.21 (0.41)
Receive new servicesa 0.08 (0.41) 0.17 (0.45) 0.34 (0.48) 0.32 (0.41) 0.39 (0.42) −0.68 (0.54) 0.98** (0.48) 0.44 (0.44)
Have prescheduled appointmentsa −0.50 (0.46) −0.55 (0.50) −0.01 (0.46) 0.17 (0.42) −1.06** (0.50) −1.19*** (0.50) −0.87* (0.47) −0.50 (0.45)
Log waiting daysb 0.58 (0.69) 0.85 (0.71) 1.11* (0.61) 0.39 (0.92) 1.00 (0.98) 1.75* (0.95) 0.15 (0.92) 1.04 (1.03)
Log waiting timeb −0.30 (0.63) 0.07 (0.68) −0.57 (0.69) 0.09 (0.78) −1.40** (0.61) −0.45 (0.69) −2.87*** (0.70) −2.59*** (0.79)
***

p≤0.01

**

p≤0.05

*

p≤0.1.

a

Logistic regression.

b

OLS regression.