Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 6;7:110. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-110

Table 3.

Performance comparison of the three-feature SVM classifier to linear classifiers, an RBF network classifier and other SVM classifiers, using canonical training and testing datasets.

Accuracy

Feature(s) Canonical testing dataset Homologous-regions-only testing dataset

3-feature SVM classifier Sequence similarity, inverse CBIN count, match/mismatch fraction (cf. Table 2) 99.63% 98.98%
2-feature SVM classifiers Match/mismatch fraction, sequence similarity 97.50% 96.68%

Inverse CBIN count, sequence similarity 99.32% 98.97%

Match/mismatch fraction, inverse CBIN count 99.42% 98.91%

RBF Network classifier Sequence similarity, inverse CBIN count, match/mismatch fraction 99.32% 98.79%

3-feature linear classifier Sequence similarity, inverse CBIN count, match/mismatch fraction 99.42% 98.80%

2-feature linear classifiers Match/mismatch fraction, sequence similarity 99.03% 98.75%

Inverse CBIN count, sequence similarity 99.32% 98.67%

Match/mismatch fraction, inverse CBIN count 99.37% 98.77%

1-feature linear classifiers Sequence similarity 82.22% 82.02%

Match/mismatch fraction 98.05% 98.62%

Inverse CBIN count 99.37% 98.75%