Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gut logoLink to Gut
. 1985 Apr;26(4):384–392. doi: 10.1136/gut.26.4.384

Mechanical properties of the colon: comparison of the features of the African and European colon in vitro.

D A Watters, A N Smith, M A Eastwood, K C Anderson, R A Elton, J W Mugerwa
PMCID: PMC1432523  PMID: 3920126

Abstract

The tensile properties of the colon have been examined using methods which gave repeatable results. They showed little change after storage in salt for up to five weeks. The burst strength remained unchanged along the length of the colon. The tensile strength fell distally, as the thickness of the colonic wall increased. The width at burst decreased distally as did the internal diameter. The visco-elastic property of stress relaxation was constant in all regions. The tensile property of the colon was well developed at birth, but fell with age as did the width at burst and the internal diameter. Stress relaxation was unaffected. Because there may be a mechanical abnormality of the colonic wall in diverticular disease and as Europeans are prone to this condition while Africans are not commonly affected, European and African colons were compared. The tensile strength in a Kampala group was greater than in an Edinburgh one, but fell significantly in both groups with age. The width at burst was greater in the Kampala group, but also declined with age. Stress-relaxation was similar in both groups. In view of the similar properties in childhood of colons from Edinburgh and Kampala, the strength of the adult African compared with European colons may derive later from environmental factors such as diet. There were, however, no differences between the colons with and without diverticular disease in European subjects over the age of 50 years.

Full text

PDF
384

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burkitt D. P., Walker A. R., Painter N. S. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet. 1972 Dec 30;2(7792):1408–1412. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92974-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hodgson I. An animal model to study diverticular disease. Br J Surg. 1972 Apr;59(4):315–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hughes L. E. Postmortem survey of diverticular disease of the colon. II. The muscular abnormality of the sigmoid colon. Gut. 1969 May;10(5):344–351. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.5.344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Motility studies in diverticular disease of the colon: Part II Effect of colonic and rectal distension. Gut. 1969 Jul;10(7):538–542. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.7.538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Orberg J. W., Klein L., Hiltner A. Scanning electron microscopy of collagen fibers in intestine. Connect Tissue Res. 1982;9(3):187–193. doi: 10.3109/03008208209160260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parks T. G. Rectal and colonic studies after resection of the sigmoid for diverticular disease. Gut. 1970 Feb;11(2):121–125. doi: 10.1136/gut.11.2.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith A. N., Shepherd J., Eastwood M. A. Pressure changes after balloon distension of the colon wall in diverticular disease. Gut. 1981 Oct;22(10):841–844. doi: 10.1136/gut.22.10.841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Walker A. R., Walker B. F., Richardson B. D. Bowel transit times in Bantu populations. Br Med J. 1970 Jul 4;3(5713):48–49. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5713.48-c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gut are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES