Skip to main content
. 2002 Jun;37(3):647–665. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00042

Table 2.

Results from Modelling of Hazard for Unplanned Readmissions within 30 Days after Discharge. Cox' Regression Analysis, with Adjustment for Clustering Effects.§ 113,055 Patients Were Included, of these 9,692 Were Readmitted

Statistics
Hazard Ratio
Variables§§ (95% CI) z or2)§§§ p
Hospital practice
Index of hospital LOS§§§§ (23.88, 3 df <0.0001)
 1 1.00
 2 1.10 (1.02, 1.20) 2.33  0.020
 3 0.89 (0.81, 0.96) −2.79  0.005
 4 0.87 (0.80, 0.94) −3.34  0.001
Staffing ratio§§§§§ (31.32, 3 df <0.0001)
 1 1.00
 2 1.14 (1.06, 1.23) 3.42  0.001
 3 1.21 (1.12, 1.31) 4.67 <0.0001
 4 1.00 (0.89, 1.13) 0.05  0.961
Costs per admission (10.06, 3 df  0.018)
 1 1.00
 2 1.12 (1.01, 1.25) 2.16  0.031
 3 0.98 (0.88, 1.09) −0.39  0.695
 4 1.06 (0.96, 1.16) 1.18  0.239
Stand. emerg. admission rate (6.12, 3 df  0.106)
 1 1.00
 2 1.00 (0.92, 1.08) −0.01  0.993
 3 1.10 (1.01, 1.20) 2.13  0.034
 4 1.05 (0.96, 1.15) 1.02  0.310
Specialization of hospital  (2.70, 2 df  0.259)
 Regional 1.00
 County 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) −1.05  0.294
 Local 1.02 (0.94, 1.10) 0.40  0.690
Patient factors
 Age
 67−80 years 1.00
 >80 years 1.09 (1.02, 1.15) 2.74  0.006
Gender
 Female 1.00
 Male 1.18 (1.14, 1.22) 8.80 <0.0001
Type of index admission
 Elective 1.00
 Emergent 1.91 (1.78, 2.05) 17.94 <0.0001
Medical or surgical DRG
 Surgical 1.00
 Medical 1.27 (1.17, 1.37)   5.73 <0.0001
Cost-weight of the patient's DRG (246.38, 3 df <0.0001)
 1 1.00
 2 1.34 (1.25, 1.43)   8.25 <0.0001
 3 1.61 (1.52, 1.72)  15.07 <0.0001
 4 1.24 (1.15, 1.33)   5.78 <0.0001
Discharge destination
 To another institution 1.00
 Home 1.03 (0.94, 1.13)   0.62 0.534
Living near hospital
 No 1.00
 Yes 1.31 (1.23, 1.40)   8.16 <0.0001
§

The summary results of the model were: log likelihood =−111284.4, Wald χ2(23)=2306.7.

§§

For category-variables scaled into four groups, each category represents one quartile of the distribution, see also Table 1. To unify the format of category-variables, those formatted in quartiles were all kept as four categories even if a simplification seems reasonable.

§§§

The overall effect of category-variables was tested using repeated (aggregated) tests (χ2).

§§§§

The index reflects a relative measure of average hospital LOS adjusted for differences in patient-population by way of DRGs and DRG-specific average LOS.

§§§§§

Defined as the annual number of discharges/(man-years of personnel × 365). Adjusted for differences in patient-population by way of DRG and cost-weights.