Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Apr 26;80(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.02.005

Table 4.

Configural frequency analysis of ethnic differences in the sequence of onset of abuse and dependence diagnoses

Substance Abuse onset
Total N Omnibus row χ2 χ2 Difference in sequences
Before dependence Same year as dependence After dependence
Ethnic differences
    Alcohol
        Afr.—Am.a 133(58),79%b 20,12% 16(4),9%c 169 156.65d 0.53
        Cauc.a 312 (125),77%b 57,14% 36(9),9%c 405 349.73
    Cannabis
        Afr.—Am.a 76(43),61%b 15,12% 33(15),27% 124 47.53d 14.64d
        Cauc. a 105(63),58%b 51,28% 26(9),14% 182 53.75d
    Cocaine
        Afr.—Am.a 56(11),28%c 107,54%b 36(6),18%c 199 40.41d 2.79
        Cauc.a 37(17),26% 89,62%b 18(9),13% 144 56.29d
    Opiates
        Afr.—Am.a 25(8),32% 36,46% 18(6),23% 79 6.25d 0.66
        Cauc. 28(18),36% 35,45% 14(4),18% 77 8.91d

Notes: Separate configural frequency analyses were conducted for each substance among persons with either or both abuse and dependence. Percentiles indicate the proportion of the total number of participants that experienced a disorder associated with the row substance in the column sequence. Some row percentiles may not sum to 100% because of rounding error. Parenthetical values indicate the ‘n’ experiencing either abuse only (in the “before dependence” column) or dependence only (in the “after dependence” column). “Total N” is slightly lower than number of persons meeting lifetime criteria for both abuse and dependence in Table 1 because of missing age of onset data.

a

Frequencies of the sequences differed significantly from random order.

b

Sequence was common, compared to chance (Type).

c

Sequence was rare, compared to chance (Antitype).

d

Difference in sequences of onset of disorders was significant (p< .025).