Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2006 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Sep;17(9):1613–1620. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1613

Table 2.

Mean (±SE) Cross-Sectional Areal Data From Noninvasive Loading of the Mouse Tibia

Ps.Ar (mm2) Ec.Ar (mm2) Ct.Ar (mm2)
Low Intact 0.889 (±0.036) 0.399 (±0.025) 0.491 (±0.013)
Load 0.880 (±0.018) 0.385 (±0.017) 0.495 (±0.006)
High Intact 0.840 (±0.022) 0.347 (±0.013) 0.493 (±0.012)
Load 0.870 (±0.023) 0.352 (±0.013) 0.518 (±0.011)
Rest Intact 0.857 (±0.026) 0.390 (±0.014) 0.466 (±0.012)
Load 0.898 (±0.022) 0.403 (±0.015) 0.495 (±0.009)

Significant differences are in bold.

Low, low-magnitude loading group; high, high-magnitude loading group; rest, rest-inserted loading group; intact, intact left tibia; load, experimentally loaded right tibia; bold, loaded tibias significantly increased versus intact tibias (p < 0.05).