Skip to main content
. 2006 Mar 20;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-6-5

Table 5.

Best QSAR models for GFA and G/PLS based on binding Pockets in comparison with the PLS method. * PLS Models based on Cerius GFA & G/PLS Models respectively.

Model QSAR Analysis 1 Cerius 2 SYBYL Equation Length
Terms + Constant
STATISTICAL PARAMETERS

TRAINING SET TEST SET

LOF SEP r 2 (CV) r 2 SEE PRESS r r 2 PRESS
Total + Electrostatic + VDW GFA 1 13 0.204 0.796 0.681 12.949 0.762 0.499 41.896
G/PLS 1 16 - 0.789 0.611 16.029 0.843 0.711 37.423
PLS2 (GFA) 13 0.593 0.546 0.439 0.533 19.349 0.714 0.510 41.707
PLS2 (G/PLS) 16 0.704 0.432 0.284 0.628 30.279 0.818 0.699 42.235
Electrostatic + VDW GFA 1 13 0.242 0.751 0.647 15.194 0.698 0.487 37.794
G/PLS 1 19 - 0.643 0.355 23.922 0.605 0.366 40.364
PLS2 (GFA) 13 0.548 0.659 0.528 0.466 14.709 0.344 0.118 51.406
PLS2 (G/PLS) 19 0.729 0.523 0.254 0.583 25.187 0.480 0.230 45.155
Total GFA 1 20 0.280 0.810 0.624 - 0.210 0.044 60.931
G/PLS 1 20 - 0.528 0.072 28.473 0.513 0.263 58.726
PLS2 (GFA) 20 0.627 0.539 0.369 0.536 19.527 0.636 0.405 47.833
PLS2 (G/PLS) 20 0.654 0.434 0.256 0.571 24.467 0.625 0.425 52.133