Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Plant Cell logoLink to The Plant Cell
. 1999 Aug;11(8):1405–1418. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.8.1405

Expression of CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) and CEN-like genes in tobacco reveals a conserved mechanism controlling phase change in diverse species.

I Amaya 1, O J Ratcliffe 1, D J Bradley 1
PMCID: PMC144298  PMID: 10449576

Abstract

Plant species exhibit two primary forms of flowering architecture, namely, indeterminate and determinate. Antirrhinum is an indeterminate species in which shoots grow indefinitely and only generate flowers from their periphery. Tobacco is a determinate species in which shoot meristems terminate by converting to a flower. We show that tobacco is responsive to the CENTRORADIALIS (CEN) gene, which is required for indeterminate growth of the shoot meristem in Antirrhinum. Tobacco plants overexpressing CEN have an extended vegetative phase, delaying the switch to flowering. Therefore, CEN defines a conserved system controlling shoot meristem identity and plant architecture in diverse species. To understand the underlying basis for differences between determinate and indeterminate architectures, we isolated CEN-like genes from tobacco (CET genes). In tobacco, the CET genes most similar to CEN are not expressed in the main shoot meristem; their expression is restricted to vegetative axillary meristems. As vegetative meristems develop into flowering shoots, CET genes are downregulated as floral meristem identity genes are upregulated. Our results suggest a general model for tobacco, Antirrhinum, and Arabidopsis, whereby the complementary expression patterns of CEN-like genes and floral meristem identity genes underlie different plant architectures.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (421.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science. 1985 Mar 8;227(4691):1229–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4691.1229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradley D., Carpenter R., Copsey L., Vincent C., Rothstein S., Coen E. Control of inflorescence architecture in Antirrhinum. Nature. 1996 Feb 29;379(6568):791–797. doi: 10.1038/379791a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley D., Ratcliffe O., Vincent C., Carpenter R., Coen E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997 Jan 3;275(5296):80–83. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5296.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coen E. S., Romero J. M., Doyle S., Elliott R., Murphy G., Carpenter R. floricaula: a homeotic gene required for flower development in antirrhinum majus. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1311–1322. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90426-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Colasanti J., Yuan Z., Sundaresan V. The indeterminate gene encodes a zinc finger protein and regulates a leaf-generated signal required for the transition to flowering in maize. Cell. 1998 May 15;93(4):593–603. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81188-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frohman M. A., Dush M. K., Martin G. R. Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Dec;85(23):8998–9002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.23.8998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gray J. C., Kung S. D., Wildman S. G. Origin of Nicotiana tabacum L. detected by polypeptide composition of Fraction I protein. Nature. 1974 Nov 15;252(5480):226–227. doi: 10.1038/252226a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gustafson-Brown C., Savidge B., Yanofsky M. F. Regulation of the arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Cell. 1994 Jan 14;76(1):131–143. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huijser P., Klein J., Lönnig W. E., Meijer H., Saedler H., Sommer H. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1239–1249. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05168.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Irish V. F., Sussex I. M. Function of the apetala-1 gene during Arabidopsis floral development. Plant Cell. 1990 Aug;2(8):741–753. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.8.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones J. D., Shlumukov L., Carland F., English J., Scofield S. R., Bishop G. J., Harrison K. Effective vectors for transformation, expression of heterologous genes, and assaying transposon excision in transgenic plants. Transgenic Res. 1992 Nov;1(6):285–297. doi: 10.1007/BF02525170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kelly A. J., Bonnlander M. B., Meeks-Wagner D. R. NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems. Plant Cell. 1995 Feb;7(2):225–234. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koornneef Maarten, Alonso-Blanco Carlos, Peeters Anton J. M., Soppe Wim. GENETIC CONTROL OF FLOWERING TIME IN ARABIDOPSIS. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Jun;49(NaN):345–370. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levy YY, Dean C. The transition to flowering . Plant Cell. 1998 Dec;10(12):1973–1990. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.12.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mandel M. A., Gustafson-Brown C., Savidge B., Yanofsky M. F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):273–277. doi: 10.1038/360273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mandel M. A., Yanofsky M. F. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):522–524. doi: 10.1038/377522a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Odell J. T., Nagy F., Chua N. H. Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. 1985 Feb 28-Mar 6Nature. 313(6005):810–812. doi: 10.1038/313810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ohshima S., Murata M., Sakamoto W., Ogura Y., Motoyoshi F. Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1. Mol Gen Genet. 1997 Mar 26;254(2):186–194. doi: 10.1007/s004380050407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pnueli L., Carmel-Goren L., Hareven D., Gutfinger T., Alvarez J., Ganal M., Zamir D., Lifschitz E. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development. 1998 Jun;125(11):1979–1989. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.11.1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of shoot morphogenesis in plants. Science. 1990 Nov 16;250(4983):923–930. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4983.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pouteau S., Nicholls D., Tooke F., Coen E., Battey N. The induction and maintenance of flowering in Impatiens. Development. 1997 Sep;124(17):3343–3351. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.17.3343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ratcliffe O. J., Amaya I., Vincent C. A., Rothstein S., Carpenter R., Coen E. S., Bradley D. J. A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. Development. 1998 May;125(9):1609–1615. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.9.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ratcliffe O. J., Bradley D. J., Coen E. S. Separation of shoot and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Development. 1999 Mar;126(6):1109–1120. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schultz E. A., Haughn G. W. LEAFY, a Homeotic Gene That Regulates Inflorescence Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1991 Aug;3(8):771–781. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.8.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shannon S., Meeks-Wagner D. R. A Mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 Gene Affects Inflorescence Meristem Development. Plant Cell. 1991 Sep;3(9):877–892. doi: 10.1105/tpc.3.9.877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shannon S., Meeks-Wagner D. R. Genetic Interactions That Regulate Inflorescence Development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1993 Jun;5(6):639–655. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Souer E., van der Krol A., Kloos D., Spelt C., Bliek M., Mol J., Koes R. Genetic control of branching pattern and floral identity during Petunia inflorescence development. Development. 1998 Feb;125(4):733–742. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.4.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Telfer A., Bollman K. M., Poethig R. S. Phase change and the regulation of trichome distribution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1997 Feb;124(3):645–654. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.3.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weigel D., Alvarez J., Smyth D. R., Yanofsky M. F., Meyerowitz E. M. LEAFY controls floral meristem identity in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):843–859. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90295-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Weigel D., Nilsson O. A developmental switch sufficient for flower initiation in diverse plants. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):495–500. doi: 10.1038/377495a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Plant Cell are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES