Skip to main content
. 2006 May;17(5):2223–2235. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-08-0749

Table 2.

Comparison of diffusion rates and mobility of FGFR1-EGFP in the presence of known interacting proteins and controls that do not interact

Protein Recovery rate t1/2 (s) Mobile population (%)
FGFR1-pcDNA (n = 21) 8.607 ± 0.917 38.531 ± 2.113
FGFR1-CBP (n = 9) 9.751 ± 2.06 49.091 ± 0.326
FGFR1-RSK1 (n = 30) 1.273 ± 0.341 73.342 ± 2.202
FGFR1-RSKmt (n = 21) 9.556 ± 1.75 54.163 ± 3.48
FGFR1(TK-)-pcDNA (n = 25) 0.807 ± 0.119 46.502 ± 6.585
FGFR1(TK-)-RSK1 (n = 30) 0.764 ± 0.154 53.037 ± 6.124

Average values are given for the indicated number of cells, which was calculated by averaging the t1/2 or mobility value for each cell fit by nonlinear regression analysis. Error is expressed as SEM t1/2 and mobile population of FGFR1 in the presence of cotransfected RSK1 (but not CBP) were significantly different from FGFR1-pcDNA (p < 0.001). No significant differences between FGFR1(TK-) cotransfected with control plasmid (pcDNA) or RSK1 were found.