TABLE 1.
Low Nurse Staffing OR (95% CI) | Low Resource Adequacy OR (95% CI) | Low Nurse Manager Leadership OR (95% CI) | High Emotional Exhaustion OR (95% CI) | |
Significant risk due to staff carelessness | 1.92 (1.31, 2.82) | 1.88 (1.25, 2.83) | 1.65 (1.05, 2.58) | 2.16 (1.33, 3.50) |
Significant risk due to staff inexperience | 1.74 (1.04, 2.92) | 2.18 (1.47, 3.24) | 1.80 (1.11, 2.93) | 2.06 (1.31, 3.23) |
Significant risk due to patient uncooperativeness | 2.11 (1.32, 3.38) | 2.13 (1.34, 3.40) | 1.71 (1.06, 2.76) | 1.32 (0.74, 2.35) |
Often recaps needles used on patients with unknown HIV status | 2.40 (1.29, 4.46) | 3.30 (2.08, 5.23) | 2.16 (1.22, 3.16) | 1.78 (0.87, 3.62) |
Feels hospital has not done a good job providing knowledge to protect workers | 2.76 (1.72, 4.42) | 2.44 (1.48, 4.00) | 1.54 (0.88, 2.71) | 1.94 (1.15, 3.27) |
Feels hospital has not done a good job providing supplies to protect workers | 3.56 (2.18, 5.81) | 2.94 (1.64, 5.17) | 1.86 (1.07, 3.26) | 1.86 (1.02, 3.37) |
Note. Odds ratios were computed with generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by hospital unit.