TABLE 2.
Sexual Activity | Contraceptive Use | |||||
Variable | Coefficient | SE | Marginal Effect | Coefficient | SE | Marginal Effect |
Constant | –4.470 | .620 | . . . | 2.153 | 2.151 | . . . |
Black | .162 | .141 | .061 | .073 | .232 | .017 |
Hispanic | –.032 | .143 | –.012 | –.208 | .219 | –.050 |
Age | .261*** | .037 | .098 | –.087 | .112 | –.021 |
Years since menarche | .065** | .027 | .024 | . . . | . . . | . . . |
No-parent household | .548** | .236 | .205 | –.057 | .336 | –.014 |
Single-parent household | .301*** | .089 | .113 | –.045 | .162 | –.011 |
Parents’ education | –.027 | .015 | –.010 | .013 | .024 | .003 |
Household income < $20 000 | .130 | .094 | .048 | –.113 | .138 | –.027 |
Household income > $70 000 | –.002 | .108 | –.001 | –.160 | .177 | –.038 |
Raised as Catholic | –.010 | .096 | –.003 | –.085 | .146 | –.020 |
Raised with no religion | .344*** | .132 | .129 | –.282 | .192 | –.067 |
Urban | –.061 | .125 | –.023 | .052 | .187 | .012 |
Northeast | .045 | .128 | .017 | .145 | .190 | .034 |
Midwest | –.036 | .112 | –.014 | –.004 | .172 | –.001 |
West | –.169 | .133 | –.063 | –.132 | .228 | –.031 |
Percentage tract Black | –.004* | .002 | –.002 | –.001 | .004 | –.0002 |
Percentage tract Hispanic | .001 | .004 | .0002 | .003 | .005 | .001 |
Median income in tract ($1000s) | –.008** | .004 | –.003 | .020*** | .006 | .005 |
County unemployment rate | –.007 | .018 | –.003 | –.049 | .037 | –.012 |
Family planning clinics (per 10 000 women aged 15–44 years) in county of residence | –.010 | .018 | –.004 | .079* | .042 | .019 |
Sex education requirement | .001 | .085 | .0005 | –.115 | .131 | –.027 |
Abortion provider in county of residence | .032 | .103 | .012 | –.045 | .148 | –.010 |
Medicaid funding of abortions | .051 | .110 | .019 | –.073 | .166 | –.017 |
Parental notification or consent law | .043 | .101 | .016 | .026 | .163 | .006 |
Correlation coefficient (SE) | –.663 (.762 ) | |||||
Log-likelihood | –1029.102 | |||||
Sample size | 1 280 |
*Statistically significant at .1 level; **statistically significant at .05 level; *** statistically significant at .01 level (2-tailed test). Models include controls for missing county and tract variables.