Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec;92(12):1952–1957. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.12.1952

TABLE 1.

—Change in Incidence (%) of New Male Drug Users in Intervention and Control Areas Before and After Intervention Program: Longchuan County, Yunnan Province, China

Intervention Area Control Area
Variable Baseline Period (10/95–2/97) Follow-Up Period (5/97–9/98) Percentage-Point Change Baseline Period (10/95–2/97) Follow-Up Period (5/97–9/98) Percentage-Point Change Attributable Risk Reductiona Incidence Ratio (95% CI) P
Total 3.47 (21/606) 1.88 (11/584) –1.59 2.10 (10/477) 1.50 (7/466) –0.60 –0.99 1.3 (1.0, 1.8) .048
Age, y
    15–19 3.30 (3/91) 1.14 (1/88) –2.16 0 (0/76) 2.63 (2/76) +2.63 –4.79 152 (58, 429)b <.001
    20–29 6.82 (15/220) 2.94 (6/204) –3.88 4.12 (8/194) 1.62 (3/185) –2.50 –1.38 0.9 (0.7, 1.2) .43
    30–39 1.66 (3/181) 2.25 (4/178) +0.59 1.38 (2/145) 1.40 (2/143) +0.02 +0.57 0.8 (0.5, 1.0) .07
    40–49 0 (0/113) 0 (0/113) 0 0 (0/62) 0 (0/62) 0
Marital status
    Single 5.61 (11/196) 2.70 (5/185) –2.91 2.34 (4/171) 2.41 (4/166) +0.07 –2.98 2.1 (1.7, 2.7) <.001
    Married 2.48 (10/403) 1.53 (6/392) –0.95 1.98 (6/303) 1.01 (3/297) –0.97 +0.02 0.8 (0.6, 1.2) .23
    Others 0 (0/7) 0 (0/7) 0 0 (0/3) 0 (0/3) 0
Ethnic group
    Jingpo 5.59 (18/322) 3.63 (11/303) –1.96 3.45 (4/116) 4.5 (5/111) +1.05 –3.01 2.0 (1.6, 2.4) <.001
    Dai 0.60 (1/168) 0 (0/167) –0.60 0.74 (2/270) 0.75 (2/268) +0.01 –0.61 12.2 (4.4, 35.6)b <.001
    Han 1.83 (2/109) 0 (0/107) –1.83 5.41 (4/74) 0 (0/70) –5.41 +3.58 0.3 (0.1, 1.4)b .075
    Others 0 (0/7) 0 (0/7) 0 0 (0/17) 0 (0/17) 0
Education
    Illiterate/semiliterate 7.50 (6/80) 1.35 (1/74) –6.15 0.94 (1/106) 0.95 (1/105) +0.01 –6.16 5.6 (4.0, 7.7) <.001
    Primary 3.47 (12/346) 2.10 (7/333) –1.37 1.92 (5/260) 1.57 (4/254) –0.35 –1.02 1.4 (1.0, 1.8) .029
    Secondary 1.69 (3/178) 1.71 (3/175) +0.02 3.60 (4/111) 1.87 (2/107) –1.73 +1.75 0.5 (0.4, 0.7) <.001

Note. CI = confidence interval.

aAttributable risk reduction = change in intervention group minus change in control group. Minus signs indicate decreases (i.e., actual reductions); plus signs indicate increases in attributable risk.

bAdjusted by using an incidence of 0.05% to replace 0% for calculating the incidence ratio.