Skip to main content
. 2002 Dec;92(12):1958–1963. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.12.1958

TABLE 2.

—Crude HIV Prevalence and Adjusted Associations of Birth Region With HIV Seroprevalence Among Male and Female Public STD Clinic Attendees: Los Angeles County, 1993–1999 (n = 60 849a)

Female Clients Male Clients
Birth Region N Crude % HIV+ AORb (95% CI) N Crude % HIV+ AORb (95% CI)
Caribbean/West Indies 158 0.6 0.84 (0.12, 6.10) 458 3.7 1.10 (0.66, 1.80)
Central America/Mexico 8657 0.4 0.54 (0.36, 0.81) 11 462 2.5 0.92 (0.79, 1.10)
East Asia/Pacific Islands 193 0.0 c 186 1.1 0.36 (0.08, 1.50)
Europe/former USSR 161 0.6 0.94 (0.13, 6.80) 355 2.0 0.55 (0.25, 1.20)
North Africa/Middle East 23 0.0 c 98 4.1 1.60 (0.60, 4.50)
Sub-Saharan Africa 87 5.7 8.60 (3.40, 22.00) 229 0.9 0.27 (0.06, 1.10)
South/Southeast Asia 233 0.4 0.69 (0.09, 5.00) 340 0.9 0.26 (0.08, 0.82)
South America 171 0.6 0.84 (0.12, 6.10) 262 2.3 0.60 (0.26, 1.40)
All foreign-bornd 9737 0.4 0.68 (0.37, 1.30) 13 471 2.5 1.30 (1.00, 1.60)
United States 14 326 0.6 1.00 23 315 2.6 1.00

Note. AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; STD = sexually transmitted disease.

aInformation on sex was missing or discrepant for 271 clients.

bNo HIV-positive clients in strata.

cAOR from multiple logistic regression of HIV seropositivity on birth region, controlling for age and behavioral risk group (i.e., men who reported ever having sexual intercourse with men, men who reported only having sexual intercourse with women, and persons who reported ever injecting drugs).

dBirth region not classified for 135 foreign-born clients.