Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;103:537–567.

TABLE 1.

CLINICAL DATA FOR PATIENTS WITH EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE

PHM VISIBILITY
FELLOW EYE
PATIENT NO. ONSET AGE (YR)/SEX/EYE SYMPTOM DURATION (MO) VISUAL ACUITY ERM GRADE BIOMICROSCOPY OCT B-SCAN PVD STAGE ADHESION SIZE (μM) WEISS RING ERM GRADE
1 72/M/OD 12 20/50 3 No No Yes 1* ND Yes 3
2 66/M/OS 4 20/20 1 No Yes Yes 1 2,050 Yes 2
3 60/M/OS 36 20/30 3 No No Yes 4 N/A Yes 3
4 36/F/OS 72 20/25 3 No Yes Yes 1 2,090 No 0
5 66/M/OS 192 20/40 2 No ND Yes 3 N/A
6 76/F/OD 4 20/100 3 No Yes Yes 3 N/A
/OS 1.5 20/30 1 No Yes ND 1 200
7 71/M/OD 1 20/30 2 No Yes ND 2 N/A Yes 3
8 69/M/OD 18 20/200 3 No Yes ND 1 470 Yes 2
9 68/M/OD 0 20/20 1 Yes ND Yes 4 N/A Yes 2
10 69/M/OD 5 20/50 3 No Yes Yes 2 N/A No 0
11 56/F/OD 60 20/80 3 Yes Yes ND 2 N/A No 0

ERM = epiretinal membrane; N/A = not applicable; ND = not done; OCT = optical coherence tomography; PHM = posterior hyaloid membrane; PVD = posterior vitreous detachment.

*

Two separate vitreomacular adhesions were found at surgery.

Eye had previously undergone vitrectomy for ERM.

ERM was associated with peripheral retinal tear.