Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;103:173–186.

TABLE 5.

UTILITY VALUES OF PATIENTS WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION (ARMD) AND RESPONDENT GROUPS

ARMD GROUPINGS* UTILITY VALUE (SD; 95% CI) PVALUE
PATIENTS WITH ARMD2,3(N = 82) COMMUNITY3(N = 142) CLINICIANS3(N = 62) OPHTHALMOLOGISTS22(N = 46)
Mild (20/20 to 20/40) 0.83 (.19; .77–.89) (n = 42) 0.96 (.06; .95–.97) (n = 142) 0.93 (.10; .90–.96) (n = 62) 0.98 (.03; .97–.99) (n = 46) <.001*
Moderate (20/50 to 20/100) 0.68 (.21; .59–.77) (n = 22) 0.92 (.10; .90–.94) (n = 142) 0.88 (.12; .85–.91) (n = 62) 0.89 (.10; .86–.92) (n = 46) <.001*
Severe (20/200 or worse) 0.47 (.18; .39–.55) (n = 18) 0.86 (.15; .84–.88) (n = 142) 0.82 (.14; .78–.86) (n = 62) 0.73 (.19; .68–.78) (n = 46) <.001*
Very severe (≤ 20/800) 0.40 (.13; .31–.49) (n = 8) NA NA 0.67 (.18; .62–.72) (n = 46) <.001*

ARMD = age-related macular degeneration; NA = not available.

*

Snellen visual acuity ranges for the better-seeing eye are listed below the Mild, Moderate, Severe, and Very severe groupings.

The patient values are significantly different from those of the community, clinician, and ophthalmologist groups in all categorical ARMD groupings, by one-way analysis of variance (P <.0001.)