Skip to main content
. 2003 Apr;93(4):658–663. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.658

TABLE 4—

Canadian Civil Servants’ Assessments of How Ideas About Determinants of Health Have Been Used: Percentage Responding “Mildly Agree” or “Strongly Agree” vs “Strongly Disagree,” “Mildly Disagree,” or “Neutral/Undecided”

Level of Government Sector
Overall Provincial Federal Finance Labor Social Services Health F-test P
Knowledge pushed us to consider the value of health care spending practices 69 70 67 69 80* 72 53 .12
Knowledge influenced development of policies in my sector 65 62 74 46 63 81* 59 .12
Always trying to improve the health of populations, just don’t use that language 65 62 73 42* 51* 81 72 .02
Focus used to justify inappropriate health sector funding cuts 15 12 23 8* 0*** 21 28 .01

Note. Pairwise t tests were conducted to assess differences by level of government (with federal as the reference category) and by sector (with health sector as the reference category). F tests of the independence of proportions were conducted to identify differences among sectors.

Source. McMaster University Survey of Canadian Civil Servants, 2000.

*P ≤ .10; ** P ≤ .05; *** P ≤ .01.