Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;93(7):1098–1103. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.7.1098

TABLE 1—

Comparisons Between Women Intentionally Injured by Women and Control Participants

Injured Women (n = 167), No. (%) Control Women (n = 826), No. (%) Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Characteristics of women
Age, y
    16–24 94 (56) 284 (34) 2.2 (1.4, 3.7)
    25–34 47 (28) 280 (34) 1.6 (1.0, 2.7)
    35–45 26 (16) 262 (32) Reference
Education
    Less than high school 89 (53) 259 (31) 3.9 (2.2, 6.8)
    High school 58 (35) 358 (43) 2.1 (1.2, 3.6)
    More than high school 20 (12) 209 (25) Reference
Lives in public housing 52 (32) 152 (19) 1.6 (1.0, 2.4)
Currently is a student 57 (34) 158 (19) 1.8 (1.2, 2.8)
No. of social visits with friends per week
    None 35 (21) 236 (29) Reference
    1 or 2 38 (23) 261 (32) 1.0 (0.6, 1.7)
    3 or more 93 (56) 324 (40) 2.0 (1.3, 3.1)
Did not participate in organized social activities in past 6 mo 144 (86) 638 (77) 1.9 (1.2, 3.0)
Financial support
Receives cash assistance 77 (46) 280 (34) 2.3 (1.6, 3.3)
Has financial dependents 98 (59) 563 (68) 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Lives with >3 persons who are not partners 102 (61) 375 (46) 1.6 (1.1, 2.4)
Self-esteema
    High 55 (34) 225 (28) Reference
    Low 89 (54) 406 (50) 2.4 (1.4, 4.1)
    Midrange 20 (12) 183 (23) 2.0 (1.2, 3.4)
Uses alcohol more than 2 times per week 24 (15) 75 (9) 1.8 (1.1, 3.0)
Drug use
Used marijuana in past 6 mo 79 (47) 231 (28) 2.0 (1.4, 2.9)
Has friends who use marijuana 130 (78) 504 (62) 1.8 (1.2, 2.8)
Arrested in past 6 mo 12 (7) 29 (4) 2.2 (1.1, 4.4)
Nonformal employment (provided child care) 52 (31) 174 (21) 1.6 (1.1, 2.4)
Recent history of nonpartner violenceb 14 (9) 21 (3) 3.6 (1.8, 7.4)
Characteristics of intimate partner and relationship
Partner ever arrested 59 (37) 191 (24) 1.8 (1.3, 2.6)
Violence by male partner in past 6 mo 30 (20) 85 (12) 2.0 (1.3, 3.3)
Relationship ended in past 6 mo 39 (24) 90 (11) 2.3 (1.5, 3.6)

Note. Results are based on domain-specific analyses. The variables listed were selected from those that were statistically significant after adjustment for site of emergency department care and other variables in the domain. Owing to missing data, sample sizes for some variables do not sum to the total number of participants; percentages shown are based on the numbers of women with available data. An interaction with site of emergency department care was detected for 1 variable not shown: “lives with extended family or acquaintances/friends” exclusive of nuclear family member or intimate partner. Also not shown are 2 medical history variables, asthma and abdominal pain, that were inversely associated with intentional injury, after adjustment for site of emergency department care.

aA score of less than 30 was considered to indicate low self-esteem. A score between 30 and 37 was considered midrange self-esteem, and a score greater then 37 was considered high self-esteem.

bResponse does not include child abuse.