TABLE 2—
Distribution of Unitary Chemical Weapon Stockpile, by Storage Location
| Site | Metric Tons of Original Stockpile (1000s) | Chemical Agent(s) | Form of Munition | Destruction Technology | Percentage of Agent Destroyed as of December 31, 2002 | Status of Construction of Destruction Facility |
| Tooele, Utah | 13.6 | H/HD/HT, GB, VX | C, P, TC, R, B, M, ST | Incineration | 44 | Operational |
| Pine Bluff, Ark | 3.9 | HT/HD, GB, VX | TC, R, M | Incineration | 0 | 98% |
| Umatilla, Ore | 3.7 | HD, GB, VX | TC, P, R, B, M, ST | Incineration | 0 | 100% |
| Pueblo, Colo | 2.6 | HT/HD | C, P | Hydrolysis/biotreatment | 0 | 0% |
| Anniston, Ala | 2.3 | HT/HD, GB, VX | C, P, TC, R, M | Incineration | 0 | 100% |
| Johnston Atoll | 2.0 | HD, GB, VX | C, P, M, TC | Incineration | 100 | Operational |
| Aberdeen, Md | 1.6 | HD | TC | Hydrolysis | 0 | 85% |
| Newport, Ind | 1.3 | VX | TC | Hydrolysis | 0 | 28% |
| Blue Grass, Ky | 0.5 | HD, GB, VX | P, R | Hydrolysis/supercritical water oxidation | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 31.5 | . . . | . . . | . . . | 25 | . . . |