Skip to main content
. 2003 Sep;93(9):1576–1582. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.9.1576

TABLE 2—

Neighborhood Characteristics at Follow-Up by Treatment Group: MTO Demonstration: New York City, 1998–2000

Experimental (n = 220) Section 8 (n = 181) In-Place Control (n = 149) Difference: Experimental vs Controla Difference: Section 8vs Controla
1990 US Censusb
    Median family income, $ 23 277 (14 684) 17 922 (9283) 14 808 (6531) +8469† +3114**
    Fraction poor 0.34 (0.20) 0.40 (0.14) 0.45 (0.12) −0.11† −0.05**
    Fraction rental units 0.82 (0.25) 0.92 (0.15) 0.94 (0.15) −0.12† −0.02
    Fraction Black 0.45 (0.25) 0.40 (0.24) 0.41 (0.21) 0.04 −0.01
    Fraction Latino 0.41 (0.25) 0.48 (0.23) 0.51 (0.20) +0.10† −0.03
    Fraction White 0.12 (0.21) 0.09 (0.18) 0.06 (0.16) +0.06** +0.03
Parental reportc
    Disorderd 2.05 (0.73) 2.17 (0.65) 2.38 (0.56) −0.33† −0.21***
    Satisfactione 3.07 (1.42) 2.83 (1.33) 2.58 (1.39) +0.49† +0.25*
Interviewer observationb
    Poor external environmentf 2.27 (1.40) 2.45 (1.31) 2.72 (1.16) −0.45*** −0.27

Note. MTO = Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration. Means (SDs) are weighted by date of random assignment because the assignment ratio for the 3 groups changed throughout the randomization period.

aSignificance levels indicate significant difference compared with in-place controls.

bTest statistic computed via analysis of variance, with mean comparisons Bonferroni-adjusted.

cMeans adjusted for baseline characteristics: parental sex, race/ethnicity, age, education, employment status, marital status, and number of children in household; missing baseline characteristics were imputed to the mean of the nonmissing sample. Test statistics were computed via ordinary least squares regression.

dParents reported “how big a problem” 5 types of events in the neighborhood were, on a 3-point scale from “a big problem” (3) to “not a big problem” (1). For disorder scale, range = 1–3.

eFor satisfaction, range = 1–5.

fInterviewer observed the street block on 4 attributes, and items were recoded dichotomously, with higher scores reflecting lower quality (range 0–4).

*P < .10;

**P < .05;

***P < .01;

P < .001.