TABLE 1—

Effect of Intervention on Female-Condom Negotiation and First-Time Use Among 359 Family Planning Clients: Brooklyn, NY

	1 Month		6 Months		12 Months
	Na (%)	OR (95% CI)b	Na (%)	OR (95% CI)b	Na (%)	OR (95% CI)b
Negotiation with partner about female condomc
8-session group	80 (54)	10.28 (4.44, 23.81)	78 (22)	2.44 (1.01, 5.87)	87 (17)	3.56 (1.23, 10.18)
4-session group	89 (29)	3.86 (1.65, 9.03)	102 (20)	2.08 (0.89, 4.90)	99 (17)	3.67 (1.26, 10.7)
Control group	83 (10)	1.0	85 (11)	1.0	95 (5)	1.0
First-time female-condom used
8-session group	101 (42)	9.49 (4.01, 22.20)	98 (4)	0.54 (0.15, 1.92)	107 (5)	1.30 (0.90, 4.95)
4-session group	110 (25)	4.39 (1.84, 10.49)	113 (5)	0.73 (0.24, 2.23)	113 (6)	1.77 (0.51, 6.17)
Control group	103 (7)	1.0	97 (7)	1.0	110 (4)	1.0

^aN represents the denominators (i.e., the number of observations that were used in the generalized estimating equation [GEE] analyses for each outcome at each follow-up). Percentages refer to women reporting the behavior.

^bOdds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from a logistic regression model with GEE with an unstructured working correlation matrix. The model specifies the OR comparisons among the intervention groups and the control group at each follow-up.

^cAt any time since the last interview among women who had not reported this behavior at baseline. Women who did not report having a sexual partner at the respective follow-up were excluded.

^dAt any time since the last interview.