Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep;168(1):313–324. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.023291

TABLE 1.

Longevity assay results

Mean life span (days)
ANOVAb
Cross and treatment Female Male Combined Generations of selectiona Treatment Sex
Cross 1
 F2 26.0 28.7 27.4 NA  0.601
 S 24.0 20.5 22.2 39 (2.0) 385.53***  4.302
 L 33.8 31.5 32.7  8 (9.4)
Cross 2
 S 28.1 29.0 28.6 19 (2.0)  15.323*  1.409
 L 33.0 34.1 33.5  5 (7.6)
Cross 3 (assay 1)
 S 18.0 36.0 27.0 27 (2.1)   3.056 64.265**
 L 27.9 37.4 32.7  7 (7.1)
Cross 3 (assay 2)
 S 18.8 31.4 25.1 48 (2.0)  41.687**  7.168
 L 30.1 37 33.6 12 (8.1)
a

Number of generations of selection preceding the longevity assays. Numbers in parentheses are average generation lengths in weeks.

b

Numbers are F-values. *P < 0.02, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.0001. F-values without asterisks were not significant (P > 0.05). For the F2 generation of cross 1, the analysis was by one-way ANOVA of six values (mean male and female life span per replicate cage by three replicate cages) with sex as the factor. All other analyses were three-factor ANOVAs with n = 24 (two treatments × two sexes × three replicate populations/treatment × two cages/population). Treatment (i.e., selection regime) and sex were fixed main effects, and population was a nested random effect within treatment. The F-ratio for the treatment effect was MStreatment/MSpopulation(treatment). The F-test for the sex effect was MSsex/MSsex×population(treatment). Population (treatment) and the interaction effects—sex × treatment and sex × population (treatment)—were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) in all four three-factor analyses.