Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug;94(8):1366–1371. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.8.1366

TABLE 2—

Crude Risk Factors for Inadequacy of Prenatal Care Use, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 1978–1979 and 1994

1978–1979 (n = 4859) 1994 (n = 2204)
No. Inadequate Use, % Crude Risk Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) No. Inadequate Use, % Crude Risk Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Maternal age, y
    < 20 656 59.0 1.39 (1.29, 1.49) 386 29.8 1.99 (1.65, 2.42)
    20–34 3826 42.5 1.00 1607 14.9 1.00
    ≤ 35 373 49.9 1.17 (1.05, 1.31) 209 13.9 0.93 (0.65, 1.33)
    Not known 4 0
Parity
    1 1825 37.5 0.81 (0.75, 0.87) 948 14.0 0.78 (0.64, 0.96)
    2–4 2513 46.5 1.00 1142 18.0 1.00
    ≥ 5 508 67.3 1.45 (1.34, 1.56) 111 40.5 2.26 (1.75, 2.92)
    Not known 13 0
Marital status
    Married 4075 40.2 1.00 1392 8.9 1.00
    Cohabiting 486 71.4 1.78 (1.66, 1.90) 527 36.8 4.13 (3.37, 5.06)
    Single 297 72.7 1.81 (1.67, 1.96) 254 24.8 2.78 (2.12, 3.66)
    Not known 1 31
Maternal education, y
    ≤ 4 1085 63.8 2.62 (2.25, 3.07) 264 39.4 15.07 (7.48, 30.35)
    5–11 3228 42.5 1.75 (1.50, 2.04) 1497 16.3 6.23 (3.12, 12.47)
    ≥ 12 535 24.3 1.00 306 2.6 1.00
    Not known 11 137
Type of insurance
    Private 332 26.2 1.00 874 2.5 1.00
    Public 4317 47.7 1.82 (1.52, 2.19) 1290 27.9 11.09 (7.27, 16.91)
    Not known 210 40
Maternal smoking
    No 3424 42.9 1.00 1749 14.0 1.00
    Yes 1406 50.8 1.18 (1.11, 1.26) 453 30.5 2.17 (1.81, 2.61)
    Not known 29 2

Note. Subjects with missing information about gestational age and prenatal care were excluded from this analysis.