Skip to main content
. 2004 Oct;168(2):983–995. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.030056

TABLE 3.

Percentage trait variance accounted for by regression on marker phenotypes

Trait
Marker Dosage Linkage
group
mat ht tb% fb4 saudpc% fbc
PAGMAGT_174.0  S V 25.4 14.9 12.6 10.8  9.2 NS
PATMAAC_168.3  S V 38.9 24.8 18.4 17.2 15.7 NS
STM 3179_d  S V 41.5 21.3 20.0 12.1 11.9 NS
STM 5148_a  D V  7.9  6.4  1.7  2.2 NS NS
EATGMCTC_206.1  S V 15.0 12.8  4.2  6.1  5.7 NS
EATGMCTC_112.5  S V 14.8 12.2  2.2  6.0  5.1 NS
PCAMAGG_114.5  S V  8.8 13.8  5.4  8.0  7.0 NS
EAACMCAG_122.0  S V 10.4  8.7 NS  3.8  3.4 NS
PATMAGT_448.7  D IV NS NS  2.6  7.4  6.9 1.8
PACMATG_94.0  S IV NS NS NS  3.5  3.9 9.2
PGAMCAC_252.0  S IV NS NS NS  3.6  3.5 8.7
PACMAAG_274.0  S IV NS NS  2.2  7.7  9.2 6.4
PCCMATA_93.0  S IV NS NS  2.7  8.6  9.5 7.6
STM 3160_a  D IV NS NS NS 13.3 10.8 8.1

The dosage of each marker is indicated as S (simplex) or D (duplex). NS indicates that the regression is not significant at P < 0.05, while italic type indicates a regression that is significant according to a permutation test (|t| >3.8). Traits are mat, ht, tb%, and foliage blight in field (fb4 and saudpc%) and glasshouse (fbc).